skip to main content
10.1145/2883851.2883910acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Enhancing the efficiency and reliability of group differentiation through partial credit

Published:25 April 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The focus of the learning analytics community bridges the gap between controlled educational research and data mining. Online learning platforms can be used to conduct randomized controlled trials to assist in the development of interventions that increase learning gains; datasets from such research can act as a treasure trove for inquisitive data miners. The present work employs a data mining approach on randomized controlled trial data from ASSISTments, a popular online learning platform, to assess the benefits of incorporating additional student performance data when attempting to differentiate between two user groups. Through a resampling technique, we show that partial credit, defined as an algorithmic combination of binary correctness, hint usage, and attempt count, can benefit assessment and group differentiation. Partial credit reduces sample sizes required to reliably differentiate between groups that are known to differ by 58%, and reduces sample sizes required to reliably differentiate between less distinct groups by 9%.

References

  1. Attali, Y. & Powers, D. (2010). Immediate feedback and opportunity to revise answers to open-end questions. Educational and Psychological Measures, 70 (1), 22--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Corbett, A. T., Anderson, J. R. (1995). Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Heffernan, N. & Heffernan, C. (2014). The ASSISTments Ecosystem: Building a Platform that Brings Scientists and Teachers Together for Minimally Invasive Research on Human Learning and Teaching. Int J of AIED, 24(4), 470--497.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Koedinger, K. R. & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (61-78). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. MATLAB version R. 2013. a (2013). Natick, Massachusetts: MathWorks, Inc. Accessible at www.mathworks.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ostrow, K., Donnelly, C., & Heffernan, N. (2015). Optimizing Partial Credit Algorithms to Predict Student Performance. In Santos, et al. (eds.) Proc of the 8th Int Conf on EDM, 404--407.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ostrow, K., Donnelly, C., Adjei, S., & Heffernan, N. (2015). Improving Student Modeling Through Partial Credit and Problem Difficulty. In Russell, D. M., Woolf, B., & Kiczales, G. (eds.) Proc of the 2nd ACM Conf on L@S, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ostrow, K., Heffernan, N., Heffernan, C., Peterson, Z. (2015). Blocking vs. Interleaving: Examining Single-Session Effects within Middle School Math Homework. In Conati, Heffernan, Mitrovic, & Verdejo (eds.) Proc of the 17th Int Conf on AIED. Springer International, 388--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Pardos, Z. A. & Heffernan, N. T. (2010). Modeling Individualization in a Bayesian Networks Implementation of Knowledge Tracing. In De Bra, Kobsa, & Chin (eds.) Proc of the 18th Int Conf on UMAP, 255--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pardos, Z. A., & Heffernan, N. T. (2011). KT-IDEM: Introducing Item Difficulty to the Knowledge Tracing Model. In Joseph A. Konstan et al. (Eds.), Proc of the 19th Int Conf on UMAP, 243--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wang, Y. (2015). Data and Code for Enhancing the Efficiency and Reliability of Group Differentiation through Partial Credit: http://tiny.cc/LAK2016-ResamplingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang, Y. & Heffernan, N. T. (2011). The "Assistance" Model: Leveraging How Many Hints and Attempts a Student Needs. In Proc of the 24th Int FLAIRS Conf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, Y. & Heffernan, N. (2013). Extending Knowledge Tracing to Allow Partial Credit: Using Continuous versus Binary Nodes. In K. Yacef et al. (Eds.) AIED 2013, LNAI 7926, 181--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing the efficiency and reliability of group differentiation through partial credit

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          LAK '16: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge
          April 2016
          567 pages
          ISBN:9781450341905
          DOI:10.1145/2883851

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 April 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          LAK '16 Paper Acceptance Rate36of116submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader