skip to main content
10.1145/2946803.2946804acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Longitudinal, cross-site and "in the Wild": a study of public displays user communities' situated snapshots

Published:01 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Networked public displays are a new medium, and as such they can improve the quality and experience of urban spaces by providing new means to engage members of place-based communities. As they are located in different public spaces understanding commonalities and differences between their users helps in building a solid foundation for knowledge on how networked public displays operate. In this paper, we describe findings from a 12 weeks deployment of the Moment Machine application that allows posting and viewing situated snapshots across 4 displays placed in urban settings of the Screens in the Wild Network (UK). We describe similarities/differences between the four user communities in terms of the photos taken, returning users behavior, interaction session properties etc. Overall, our findings contribute to the buildup of knowledge on general engagement patterns of networked public displays. We suggest that situated snapshots and their analysis as described in this paper can be used as a research tool and methodology for capturing and uncovering the part of a place-based community interested in interacting with public displays.

References

  1. Akpan, I., Marshall, P., Bird, J., and Harrison, D. 2013. Exploring the effects of space and place on engagement with an interactive installation. In Proc. of CHI '13. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Behrens, M., Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Kostopoulou, E., North, S., Motta, W., Ye, L., Schnädelbach, H. 2013. Exploring the Effect of Spatial Layout on Mediated Urban Interactions. Proc. of PerDisp'13, California, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Clark, A. 2007. Understanding community: A review of networks, ties and contacts. NCRM Working Paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Churchill, E.F., Nelson, L., and Denoue, L. 2003. Multimedia fliers. In Proc. of C&T'03. Kluwer, 97--117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Al-Sayed, K., Kostopoulou, E., Behrens, M., and Motta, W. 2013 Networked architectural interfaces. In Proc. of ISSS'13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fatah gen. Schieck, A, Fan. S. 2012. Connected urban spaces. In Proc. of ISSS'12, Chile.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fatah gen Schieck, A., Briones, C., & Mottram, C. 2008. The Urban screen as a socialising platform: exploring the role of place within the urban space. In MEDIACITY. Situations, Practices and Encounters. Frank & Timme GmbH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Finke, M., Tang, A., Leung, R., and Blackstock, M. 2008. Lessons learned: game design for large public displays. In Proc. of DIMEA '08. ACM, 26--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fortin, C., Neustaedter, C., and Hennessy, K. 2014. Posting for Community and Culture: Considerations for the Design of Interactive Digital Bulletin Boards. In Proc. of CHI'14. ACM, 1425--1434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hole in the Earth, http://bit.ly/1exeai0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hole in Space, http://bit.ly/de6vOGGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hosio, S., Harper, R., O'Hara, K., Goncalves, J., and Kostakos, V. 2015. Life through the lens: a qualitative investigation of human behaviour with an urban photography service. In Proc. of British HCI '15. ACM, 157--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hosio, S., Goncalves, J., Kostakos, V., and Riekki, J. 2015. Crowdsourcing Public Opinion using Urban Pervasive Technologies. Policy & Internet, online first.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hosio, S., Kostakos, V., Kukka, H., Jurmu, M., Riekki, J., and Ojala, T. 2012. From school food to skate parks in a few clicks. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 425--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jose, R., Pinto, H., Silva, B., and Melro, A. 2013. Pins and posters: Paradigms for content publication on situated displays. IEEE CG&A 33, 2, 64--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kostakos, V. and Ojala, T. 2013. Public Displays Invade Urban Spaces. IEEE Pervasive Computing 12, 1, 8--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marshall, P., Morris, R., Rogers, Y., Kreitmayer, S., and Davies, M. 2011. Rethinking'multi-user'. In Proc. of CHI'11. ACM, 3033--3042. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. McCarthy, J. F., Farnham, S. D., Patel, Y., Ahuja, S., Norman, D., Hazlewood, W. R., and Lind, J. 2009. Supporting community in third places with situated social software. In Proc. of C&T'09. ACM, 225--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Memarovic, N. 2015. Understanding future challenges for networked public display systems in community settings. In Proc. of C&T '15. ACM, 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Memarovic, N., Cheverst, K., Langheinrich, M., Elhart, I., and Alt, F. 2013. Tethered or free to roam: The design space of limiting content access on community displays. In Proc. of PerDis'13. ACM, 127--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Memarovic, N., Fatah gen. Schieck, A., Schnädelbach, H., Kostopoulou, E., North, S., and Ye, L. 2015. Capture the Moment: "In the Wild" Longitudinal Case Study of Situated Snapshots Captured Through an Urban Screen in a Community Setting. Proc. CSCW'15. ACM, 242--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Memarovic, N., Fatah gen Schieck, A., Kostopoulou, E., Behrens, M., and Traunmueller, M. 2013. Moment machine: Opportunities and challenges of posting situated snapshots onto networked public displays. In Proc. of INTERACT'13. Springer, 595--602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Memarovic, N., Langheinrich, M., Cheverst, K., Taylor, N., and Alt, F. 2013. P-LAYERS-A layered framework addressing the multifaceted issues facing community-supporting public display deployments. ACM TOCHI 20, 3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Memarovic, N., Langheinrich, M., Fatah gen. Schieck, A. 2014. Community is the Message: Viewing Networked Public Displays Through McLuhan's Lens of Figure and Ground. In Proc. MAB'14 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Müller, J., Eberle, D., and Tollmar, K. 2014. Communiplay: a field study of a public display mediaspace. In Proc. of CHI'14. ACM, 1415--1424. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. North, S., Schnädelbach, H., Fatah gen Schieck, A, Motta, W., Ye, L., Behrens, M., and Kostopoulou, E. 2013. Tension space analysis: Exploring community requirements for networked urban screens. In Proc. of INTERACT'13. Springer, 81--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ojala, T., Kukka, H., Lindén, T., Heikkinen, T., Jurmu, M., Hosio, S., and Kruger, F. 2010. UBI-hotspot 1.0. In Proc. of ICIW'10. IEEE, 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Oldenburg, R., 1998. The great good place. Da Capo Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. O'Shea, C. 2010. Big Screen Quiz, http://www.chrisoshea.org/big-screen-quizGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Peltonen, P., Kurvinen, E., Salovaara, A., Jacucci, G., Ilmonen, T., Evans, J., Oulasvirta, A., and Saarikko, P. 2008. It's Mine, Don't Touch! In Proc. of CHI '08. ACM, 1285--1294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Plustouch, http://www.plustouch.nl/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rubin, S. 2015. Smile! Photo Booths Prove You're a Happy Customer. The New York Times. Retrieved January 20, 2016 from nyti.ms/1Onnw56Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Schroeter, R. 2012. Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city. In Proc. of CSCW'12. ACM, 227--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Screens in the Wild, http://www.screensinthewild.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Snipes, http://on.fb.me/1ubRAT5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Storz, O., Friday, A. Davies, N., Finney, J., Sas, C., and Sheridan, J. 2006. Public Ubiquitous Computing Systems. IEEE Perv. Comp. 5, 3 (July 2006), 40--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Telectroscope, http://www.telectroscope.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor, N., and Cheverst, K. 2009. Social interaction around a rural community photo display. Inr. Jour. of Human-Computer Studies 67, 12, 1037--1047. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Wouters, N., Huyghe, J., and Vande Moere, A. 2013. OpenWindow: citizen-controlled content on public displays. In Proc. of PerDis'13. ACM, 121--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Longitudinal, cross-site and "in the Wild": a study of public displays user communities' situated snapshots

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            MAB '16: Proceedings of the 3rd Media Architecture Biennale Conference
            June 2016
            84 pages
            ISBN:9781450347495
            DOI:10.1145/2946803

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 June 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate27of68submissions,40%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader