skip to main content
10.1145/2971485.2993921acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Stop Nigmas: Experimental Speculative Design through Pragmatic Aesthetics and Public Art

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a project titled Stop Nigmas which explores the future of privacy and surveillance. Guided by pragmatic philosophy and approaches from futures studies, speculative design, the project seeks to demonstrate how interactive objects can be used to engage the audience in creating alternative narratives about the future. In the first section, the paper outlines a narrative in a form of a timeline of events that leads to a future with explicitly restricted privacy in public spaces. Following the timeline of events, the paper describes the process of scenario development, object design, interaction design and audience engagement. The author outlines how engagement through public art and social media allows the interactive object to serve as means of speculation through John Dewey's notion of consummatory experience, allowing both the designer and the audience to act as agents of speculation. The paper concludes that pragmatic aesthetics and futures studies can provide useful guidance in designing speculative objects and interactions that are open to dialogue and participation. It suggests new research avenues for speculative design research in human-computer interaction (HCI).

References

  1. Auger, J. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24, 1, (2013), 11--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bardzell, J. and Bradzell, S., What Is Critical about Critical Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, (2013) 3297--3306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barthes, R. Rhetoric of the image, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleecker, J. Design Fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Candy, S. The Futures of Everyday Life: Politics and Design of Experiential Scenarios. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Division of The University of Hawai'i at Manoa in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science. University of Hawai'i Manoa, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalsgaard, P. Pragmatism and design thinking. International Journal of design 8, 1, (2014), 143--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dator, J. The Futures of Culture or Cultures of the Future. in Marsella, A., Tharp, R. and Ciborski, T. eds. Perspectives on Cross-Cultural Psychology, Academic Press, New York 1979, 369--388.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dator, J. Futures Studies. in Bainridge, W.S. ed. Leadership in Science and Technology, Sage Reference Series, Thousand Oaks, California, 2011, 32--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. Art as experience. Minton, New York, 1934.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. Speculative Everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kerridge, T. Designing the Debate: The Entanglement of Speculative Design and Upstream Engagement. Doctoral Thesis. Goldsmith, University of London, London, UK, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA {etc.}, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. McClave, B. Under the Shadow of the Drone - James Bridle - Brighton Festival 2013. http://www.lighthouse.org.uk/programme/james-bridle-under-the-shadow-of-the-droneGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Meltzer, T. The anti-drone hoodie that helps you beat Big Brother's spy in the sky. http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2013/mar/31/anti-drone-hoodie-big-brotherGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, J.P. Pragmatism: from Peirce to Davidson. Westview Press, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Poulsen, K. Feds Are Suspects In New Malware That Attacks TOR Anonymity. http://www.wired.com/2013/08/freedom-hosting/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Raley, R. Tactical Media. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodriguez, K. U.N. Special Rapporteur Calls Upon States to Protect Encryption and Anonymity Online. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/06/un-special-rapporteur-calls-upon-states-protect-encryption-and-anonymity-onlineGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wright, P., Wallace, J. and McCarthy, J. Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, 4, (2008), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Stop Nigmas: Experimental Speculative Design through Pragmatic Aesthetics and Public Art

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
      October 2016
      1045 pages
      ISBN:9781450347631
      DOI:10.1145/2971485

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate58of231submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader