skip to main content
10.1145/2982142.2982179acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

WeAllWalk: An Annotated Data Set of Inertial Sensor Time Series from Blind Walkers

Published:23 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce WeAllWalk, a data set of inertial sensor time series collected from blind walkers using a long cane or a guide dog. Blind participants walked through fairly long and complex indoor routes that included obstacles to be avoided and doors to be opened. Inertial data was recorded by two iPhone 6s carried by our participants in their pockets and carefully annotated. Ground truth heel strike times were measured by two small inertial sensor units clipped to the participants' shoes. We also show comparative examples of application of step counting and turn detection algorithms to selected data from WeAllWalk.

References

  1. Alzantot, M., & Youssef, M. (2012, April). UPTIME: Ubiquitous pedestrian tracking using mobile phones. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2012 IEEE (pp. 3204--3209). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Angermann, M., Robertson, P., Kemptner, T., & Khide, M. (2010, September). A high precision reference data set for pedestrian navigation using foot-mounted inertial sensors. In Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2010 International Conference on (pp. 1--6). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Apostolopoulos, I., Coming, D. S., & Folmer, E. (2015, April). Accuracy of pedometry on a head-mounted display. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2153--2156). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Blasch, B. B., LaGrow, S. J., & De l'Aune, W. R. (1996). Three aspects of coverage provided by the long cane: Object, surface, and foot-placement preview. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 90, 295--30Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brajdic, A., & Harle, R. (2013, September). Walk detection and step counting on unconstrained smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing (pp. 225--234). ACM. Data set available at www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~ab818/ubicomp2013.html Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chen, D., Feng, W., Zhao, Q., Hu, M., & Wang, T. (2012). An infrastructure-free indoor navigation system for blind people. Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 552--561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Coughlan, J., Manduchi, R., & Shen, H. (2006, May). Cell phone-based wayfinding for the visually impaired. In 1st International Workshop on Mobile Vision.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dias, M. B., Steinfeld, A., & Dias, M. B. (2015). Future directions in indoor navigation technology for blind travelers. In Hassan A. Karimi (Ed.), Indoor Wayfinding and Navigation, CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fallah, N., Apostolopoulos, I., Bekris, K., & Folmer, E. (2012, May). The user as a sensor: navigating users with visual impairments in indoor spaces using tactile landmarks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 425--432). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fallah, N., Apostolopoulos, I., Bekris, K., & Folmer, E. (2013). Indoor human navigation systems: A survey. Interacting with Computers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Flores, G. H., Manduchi, R., & Zenteno, E. D. (2014, November). Ariadne's thread: Robust turn detection for path back-tracing using the iPhone. In Ubiquitous Positioning Indoor Navigation and Location Based Service (UPINLBS), 2014 (pp. 133--140). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Flores, J. Z., & Farcy, R. (2014). Indoor navigation system for the visually impaired using one inertial measurement unit (IMU) and barometer to guide in the subway stations and commercial centers. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs (pp. 411--418). Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Foster, R. C., Lanningham-Foster, L. M., Manohar, C., McCrady, S. K., Nysse, L. J., Kaufman, K. R., ... & Levine, J. A. (2005). Precision and accuracy of an ankle-worn accelerometer-based pedometer in step counting and energy expenditure. Preventive medicine, 41(3), 778--783.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Graser, S. V., Vincent, W. J., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2007). Effects of placement, attachment, and weight classification on pedometer accuracy. J Phys Act Health 4, 359--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Horvat, M., Ray, C., Ramsey, V. K., Miszko, T., Keeney, R., & Blasch, B. B. (2003). Compensatory analysis and strategies for balance in individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 97(11), 695--703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hub, A. (2008, July). Precise indoor and outdoor navigation for the blind and visually impaired using augmented maps and the TANIA system. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Low Vision (pp. 2--5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). ipin-conference.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. International Conference on Ubiquitous Positioning, Indoor Navigation and Location-Based Services (UPINLBS). upinlbs.sjtu.edu.cnGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, R. (2013). In what pocket do you keep your phone? http://phandroid.com/2013/03/25/in-what-pocket-do-you-keep-your-phone-poll/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayalath, S., Abhayasinghe, N., & Murray, I. (2013, October). A gyroscope based accurate pedometer algorithm. In International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (Vol. 28, p. 31st).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalia, A. A., Legge, G. E., Roy, R., & Ogale, A. (2010). Assessment of indoor route-finding technology for people with visual impairment. Journal of visual impairment & blindness, 104(3), 135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Košecká, J., Zhou, L., Barber, P., & Duric, Z. (2003, June). Qualitative image based localization in indoors environments. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. II-3). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ladetto, Q., & Merminod, B. (2002). In step with INS: Navigation for the blind, tracking emergency crews. Gps World, 13(10).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mannini, A., & Sabatini, A. M. (2011, August). A hidden Markov model-based technique for gait segmentation using a foot-mounted gyroscope. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 4369--4373). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Marschollek, M., Goevercin, M., Wolf, K. H., Song, B., Gietzelt, M., Haux, R., & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. (2008, August). A performance comparison of accelerometry-based step detection algorithms on a large, non-laboratory sample of healthy and mobility-impaired persons. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008. EMBS 2008. 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 1319--1322). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason, S. J., Legge, G. E., & Kallie, C. S. (2005). Variability in the length and frequency of steps of sighted and visually impaired walkers. Journal of visual impairment & blindness, 99(12), 741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Murphy Kelly, S. (2014). San Francisco Airport Tests Beacon Sensors to Guide Blind Travelers. http://mashable.com/2014/07/31/san-francisco-airport-beacons/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Nakamura, K., Aono, Y., & Tadokoro, Y. (1997). A walking navigation system for the blind. Systems and computers in Japan, 28(13), 36--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ngo, T. T., Makihara, Y., Nagahara, H., Mukaigawa, Y., & Yagi, Y. (2014). The largest inertial sensor-based gait database and performance evaluation of gait-based personal authentication. Pattern Recognition, 47(1), 228--237. Data set available at www.am.sanken.osaka-u.ac.jp/BiometricDB/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Pressl, B., & Wieser, M. (2006). A computer-based navigation system tailored to the needs of blind people. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs (pp. 1280--1286). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Riehle, T. H., Anderson, S. M., Lichter, P. A., Whalen, W. E., & Giudice, N. A. (2013, July). Indoor inertial waypoint navigation for the blind. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 5187--5190). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sabatini, A. M., Martelloni, C., Scapellato, S., & Cavallo, F. (2005). Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 52(3), 486--494.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Schafer, R. W. (2011). What is a Savitzky-Golay filter? {lecture notes}. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 28(4), 111--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Scholkmann, F., Boss, J., & Wolf, M. (2012). An efficient algorithm for automatic peak detection in noisy periodic and quasi-periodic signals. Algorithms, 5(4), 588--603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Yang, Z., Wu, C., Zhou, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2015). Mobility increases localizability: A survey on wireless indoor localization using inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 47(3), 54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yang, C. C., & Hsu, Y. L. (2010). A review of accelerometry-based wearable motion detectors for physical activity monitoring. Sensors, 10(8), 7772--7788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Yang, Z., Wu, C., & Liu, Y. (2012, August). Locating in fingerprint space: wireless indoor localization with little human intervention. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 269--280). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yoneyama, M., Kurihara, Y., Watanabe, K., & Mitoma, H. (2014). Accelerometry-based gait analysis and its application to Parkinson's disease assessment-Part 1: Detection of stride event. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 22(3), 613--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. WeAllWalk: An Annotated Data Set of Inertial Sensor Time Series from Blind Walkers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASSETS '16: Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
        October 2016
        362 pages
        ISBN:9781450341240
        DOI:10.1145/2982142

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 October 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ASSETS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate24of95submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader