skip to main content
10.1145/3012695.3012698acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaintecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards characterizing international routing detours

Published:30 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are currently no requirements (technical or otherwise) that routing paths must be contained within national boundaries. Indeed, some paths experience international detours, i.e., originate in one country, cross international boundaries and return to the same country. In most cases these are sensible traffic engineering or peering decisions at ISPs that serve multiple countries. In some cases such detours may be suspicious. Characterizing international detours is useful to a number of players: (a) network engineers trying to diagnose persistent problems, (b) policy makers aiming at adhering to certain national communication policies, (c) entrepreneurs looking for opportunities to deploy new networks, or (d) privacy-conscious states trying to minimize the amount of internal communication traversing different jurisdictions.

In this paper we characterize international detours in the Internet during the month of January 2016. To detect detours we sample BGP RIBs every 8 hours from 461 RouteViews and RIPE RIS peers spanning 30 countries. We use geolocation of ASes which geolocates each BGP prefix announced by each AS, mapping its presence at IXPs and geolocation infrastructure IPs. Finally, we analyze each global BGP RIB entry looking for detours. Our analysis shows more than 5K unique BGP prefixes experienced a detour. 132 prefixes experienced more than 50% of the detours. We observe about 544K detours. Detours either last for a few days or persist the entire month. Out of all the detours, more than 90% were transient detours that lasted for 72 hours or less. We also show different countries experience different characteristics of detours.

References

  1. Bgpmon geoinfo api. http://geoinfo.bgpmon.io.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Caida as relationships. http://www.caida.org/data/as-relationships/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Packet clearing house ixp datasets. https://prefix.pch.net/applications/ixpdir/menu_download.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Peering db 2.0 api. https://prefix.pch.net/applications/ixpdir/menu_download.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ruwaifa Anwar, Haseeb Niaz, David Choffnes, Ítalo Cunha, Phillipa Gill, and Ethan Katz-Bassett. Investigating interdomain routing policies in the wild. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC '15, pages 71--77, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jim Cowie. The new threat: Targeted internet traffic misdirection, Nov 2013. http://www.renesys.com/2013/11/mitm-internet-hijacking/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Arpit Gupta, Matt Calder, Nick Feamster, Marshini Chetty, Enrico Calandro, and Ethan Katz-Bassett. Peering at the internets frontier: A first look at isp interconnectivity in africa. In Michalis Faloutsos and Aleksandar Kuzmanovic, editors, Passive and Active Measurement, volume 8362 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 204--213. Springer International Publishing, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Josh Karlin, Stephanie Forrest, and Jennifer Rexford. Nation-state routing: Censorship, wiretapping, and BGP. CoRR, abs/0903.3218, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Maria Konte, Roberto Perdisci, and Nick Feamster. Aswatch: An as reputation system to expose bulletproof hosting ases. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 45(5):625--638, August 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Matthew Luckie, Young Hyun, and Bradley Huffaker. Traceroute probe method and forward ip path inference. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, IMC '08, pages 311--324, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jonathan A. Obar and Andrew Clement. Internet Surveillance and Boomerang Routing: A Call for Canadian Network Sovereignty. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. kc claffy Young Hyun, Andre Broido. Traceroute and bgp as path incongruities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yu Zhang, Ricardo Oliveira, Hongli Zhang, and Lixia Zhang. Quantifying the pitfalls of traceroute in as connectivity inference. In Proceedings of the 11th Passive and Active Measurement Conference, PAM'10, pages 91--100, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Towards characterizing international routing detours

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AINTEC '16: Proceedings of the 12th Asian Internet Engineering Conference
      November 2016
      72 pages
      ISBN:9781450345521
      DOI:10.1145/3012695

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate15of38submissions,39%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader