Noureddine Elouazizi
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we report on a model that uses a mathematically and cognitively augmented Latent Semantic Analysis method to automatically assess aspects of written argumentation, produced by students in a science communication course.
- Besnard, B. and A. Hunter. 2008. Elements of Argumentation. The MIT Press. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. 2011. Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory. Argumentation Library, 20. Dordrecht: Springer.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Landauer, T.K. 1998. Learning and representing verbal meaning: the latent semantic analysis theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 161--164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mayer, R. E. 1996. Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology's second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31, 151--161.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scheuer, O., Niebuhr, S., Dragon, T., McLaren B. M., & Pinkwart, N. 2012. Adaptive support for graphical argumentation - the LASAD approach. IEEE Learning Technology Newsletter, 14(1), 8--11.Google Scholar
- Shum, S.B., MacLean, J., Bellotti, A., V. M. E., & Hammond, N. V. 1997. Graphical argumentation and design cognition. Human-Computer Interaction, 12(3), 267--300. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shum, S.B., Sándor, Á., Goldsmith, R., Wang, X., Bass, R. & Mcwilliams, M. 2016. Reflecting on reflective writing analytics: Assessment challenges and iterative evaluation of a prototype tool. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 213--222. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sionti, M., Ai, H., Rosé, C. P., Resnick, L. 2011. A Framework for Analyzing Development of Argumentation through Classroom Discussions. In Educational Technologies for Teaching Argumentation Skills, Niels Pinkwart & Bruce McClaren, Eds., Bentham Science.Google Scholar
- Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. 2007. Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 2(4), 421--447.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Automated analysis of aspects of written argumentation
Recommendations
Feedback on Student Programming Assignments: Teaching Assistants vs Automated Assessment Tool
Koli Calling '23: Proceedings of the 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education ResearchExisting research does not quantify and compare the differences between automated and manual assessment in the context of feedback on programming assignments. This makes it hard to reason about the effects of adopting automated assessment at the expense ...
Evaluating students' programs using automated assessment: a case study
ITiCSE '09: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationThis poster presents our experience of using automated assessment in a programming course given by the Department of Computer Science at Holon Institute of Technology (HIT). The course was given as a first year course as part of an engineering degree ...
Evaluating students' programs using automated assessment: a case study
ITiCSE '09This poster presents our experience of using automated assessment in a programming course given by the Department of Computer Science at Holon Institute of Technology (HIT). The course was given as a first year course as part of an engineering degree ...
Comments