skip to main content
10.1145/3034786.3056123acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
invited-talk
Public Access

Data Citation: A Computational Challenge

Published:09 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data citation is an interesting computational challenge, whose solution draws on several well-studied problems in database theory: query answering using views, and provenance. We describe the problem, suggest an approach to its solution, and highlight several open research problems, both practical and theoretical.

References

  1. Out of Cite, Out of Mind: The Current State of Practice, Polocy, and Technology for the Citation of Data, volume 12. CODATA-ICSTI Task Group on Data Citation Standards and Practices, September 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. N. Afrati, C. Li, and J. D. Ullman. Using views to generate efficient evaluation plans for queries. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 73(5):703--724, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Buneman, S. Davidson, and J. Frew. Why data citation is a computational problem. CACM, 59, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Cheney, L. Chiticariu, and W. C. Tan. Provenance in databases: Why, how, and where. Foundations and Trends in Databases, 1(4):379--474, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. B. Davidson, D. Deutch, T. Milo, and G. Silvello. A model for fine-grained data citation. In CIDR 2017, 8th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Chaminade, CA, USA, January 8-11, 2017, Online Proceedings, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. FORCE-11. Data Citation Synthesis Group: Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles. FORCE11, San Diego, CA, USA, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. J. Green, G. Karvounarakis, and V. Tannen. Provenance semirings. In PODS, pages 31--40, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Y. Halevy. Answering queries using views: A survey. VLDB J., 10(4):270--294, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Popa and V. Tannen. An equational chase for path-conjunctive queries, constraints, and views. In Database Theory - ICDT '99, 7th International Conference, Jerusalem, Israel, January 10-12, 1999, Proceedings., pages 39--57, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Pröll and A. Rauber. Scalable data citation in dynamic, large databases: Model and reference implementation. In Proc. of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, pages 307--312, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Data Citation: A Computational Challenge

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PODS '17: Proceedings of the 36th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems
        May 2017
        458 pages
        ISBN:9781450341981
        DOI:10.1145/3034786

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 May 2017

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • invited-talk

        Acceptance Rates

        PODS '17 Paper Acceptance Rate29of101submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate642of2,707submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader