skip to main content
10.1145/3051457.3053983acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

One Decision Tree is Enough to Make Customization

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ability to customize instruction to individuals is a great potential for adaptive educational software. Unfortunately, beyond mastery learning and learner control, there has not been much work with adapting instruction to individuals. This paper provides an approach to determine what type of learner does best with a different intervention. We focused on constructing a decision tree that discriminated difference between tutoring interventions, and thus to make customization for each student. We evaluated our model on simulated and on real data. In the simulated data set, it outperformed other methods and the constructed models captured a pre-defined customization structure. With the real data, the customized learning approach achieved stronger learning gains than simply picking the best overall teaching option. Surprisingly, it was difficult to outperform a decision tree that simply used how quickly students tended to learn a skill. That is, more features and more complex models did not result in a more effective system.

References

  1. Benjamin S Bloom, The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational researcher, 1984. 13(6): p. 4--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jack Mostow and Joseph Beck, When the rubber meets the road: Lessons from the in-school adventures of an automated Reading Tutor that listens. Scale-Up in Education, 2006. 2: p. 183--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hyun Jin Cha, Yong Se Kim, Seon Hee Park, Tae Bok Yoon, Young Mo Jung, and Jee-Hyong Lee. Learning styles diagnosis based on user interface behaviors for the customization of learning interfaces in an intelligent tutoring system. in International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 2006. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Harold Pashler, Mark McDaniel, Doug Rohrer, and Robert Bjork, Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 2008. 9(3): p. 105--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Anthony Botelho, Hao Wan, and Neil Heffernan. The prediction of student first response using prerequisite skills. in Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hao Wan and Joseph Barbosa Beck, Considering the Influence of Prerequisite Performance on Wheel Spinning. International Educational Data Mining Society, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jong Woo Kim, Byung Hun Lee, Michael J Shaw, Hsin-Lu Chang, and Matthew Nelson, Application of decision-tree induction techniques to personalized advertisements on internet storefronts. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 200 5(3): p. 45--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerhard Weber, Hans-Christian Kuhl, and Stephan Weibelzahl. Developing adaptive internet based courses with the authoring system NetCoach. in Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia. 2001. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Joseph Jay Williams, Na Li, Juho Kim, Jacob Whitehill, Samuel Maldonado, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Larry Chu, and Neil Heffernan, The MOOClet framework: Improving online education through experimentation and personalization of modules. Available at SSRN 2523265, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hendrik Blockeel and Luc De Raedt, Top-down induction of first-order logical decision trees. Artificial intelligence, 1998. 101(1): p. 285--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Leo Breiman, Jerome Friedman, Charles J Stone, and Richard A Olshen, Classification and regression trees. 1984: CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J Ross Quinlan, C4. 5: programs for machine learning. 2014: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. One Decision Tree is Enough to Make Customization

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          L@S '17: Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
          April 2017
          352 pages
          ISBN:9781450344500
          DOI:10.1145/3051457

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 April 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          L@S '17 Paper Acceptance Rate14of105submissions,13%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

          Upcoming Conference

          L@S '24
          Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
          July 18 - 20, 2024
          Atlanta , GA , USA
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader