Collaborating around Digital Tabletops: Children's Physical Strategies from India, the UK and Finland

Abstract

We present a study of children collaborating around interactive tabletops in three different countries: India, the United Kingdom and Finland. Our data highlights the key distinctive physical strategies used by children when performing collaborative tasks during this study. Children in India employ dynamic positioning with frequent physical contact and simultaneous object movement. Children in the UK tend to prefer static positioning with minimal physical contact and simultaneous object movement. Children in Finland use a mixture of dynamic and static positioning with minimal physical contact and object movement. Our findings indicate the importance of understanding collaboration strategies and behaviours when designing and deploying interactive tabletops in heterogeneous educational environments. We conclude with a discussion on how designers of tabletops for schools can provide opportunities for children in different countries to define and shape their own collaboration strategies for small group learning that take into account their different classroom practices.

References

1. I. AlAgha, A. Hatch, L. Ma, and L. Burd. 2010. Towards a teacher-centric approach for multi-touch surfaces in classrooms. In Proceedings of ITS. ACM, 187--196.
2. M. Balint. 1954. Friendly expanses; horrid empty spaces. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 36, 4--5 (1954), 225--241.
3. D. Barnes and F. Todd. 1978. Communication and Learning in Small Groups. Routledge 8 Kegan Paul, Ltd.
4. M. L. Bernard, B. S. Chaparro, M. M. Mills, and C. G. Halcomb. 2002. Examining children's reading performance and preference for different computer-displayed text. Behaviour 8 Information Technology 21, 2 (2002), 87--96.
5. S. C. Broaders, S. W. Cook, Z. Mitchell, and S. Goldin-Meadow. 2007. Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136, 4 (2007), 539--550.
6. A. J. Cañas and J. D. Novak. 2008. Text step: Consolidating the cmappers community. In Proceedings of CMC.
7. X. Cao, S. E. Lindley, J. Helmes, and A. Sellen 2010. Telling the whole story: Anticipation, inspiration and reputation in a field deployment of TellTable. In Proceedings of CSCW. ACM.
8. A. L. Chavan. 2005. Another culture, another method. In Proceedings of HCII.
9. J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
10. J. Cuthell and C. Preston. 2008. Multimodal concept mapping in teaching and learning: A MirandaNet fellowship project. In Proceedings of Information Technology 8 Teacher Education International Conference. 1999--2007.
11. U. D’Ambrosio. 1999. Ethomathematics and its first international congress. The International Journal of Mathematics Education 31, 2 (1999), 50--53.
12. M. Deutsch. 1949. A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations 2, 1 (1949), 129--152.
13. P. Dillenbourg. 1999. What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? In Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, I. P. Dillenbourg (Ed.). Elsevier, Oxford, 1--19.
14. P. Dillenbourg and M. Evans. 2011. Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6, 4 (2011), 491--514.
15. S. Do-Lenh, F. Kaplan, and P. Dillenbourg. 2009. Paper-based concept map: The effects of tabletop on an expressive collaborative learning task. In Proceedings of HCI.
16. M. Duveskog, E. Sutinen, M. Tedre, and M. Vasisenaho. 2003. In search of contextual teaching of programming in a Tanzanian secondary school. In Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE.
17. M. Evans, E. Feenstra, E. Ryon, and D. McNeill. 2011. A multimodal approach to coding discourse: Collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6, 2 (2011), 253--278.
18. M. A. Evans, J. L. M. Wilkins, R. W. Ehrich, D. McNeill, and F. Quek. 2009. Second graders geometric reasoning with peers and manipulatives: Requirements for a multi-touch, tabletop learning technology. In Paper presented at the American Eduational Research Association Conference.
19. T. P. Falcão and S. Price. 2009. What have you done! The role of ‘Interference’ in tangible environment for supporting collaborative learning. In Proceedings of CSCL. ACM.
20. L. Festinger, K. W. Back, and S. Schachter. 1950. Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Stanford University Press.
21. R. Fleck, Y. Rogers, N. Yuill, P. Marshall, A. Carr, J. Rick, and V. Bonnett. 2009. Actions speak loudly with words: Unpacking collaboration around the table. In Proceedings of ITS. ACM.
22. V. Ha, K. M. Inkpen, T. Whalen, and R. L. Mandryk. 2006. Direct intentions: The effects of input devices on collaboration around a tabletop display. In Proceedings of the HIHS. IEEE Computer Society.
23. E. T. Hall. 1968. The Hidden Dimension. Anchor.
24. J. Y. Han. 2005. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In Proceedings of UIST. ACM.
25. A. Harris, J. Rick, V. Bonnett, N. Yuill, R. Fleck, P. Marshall, and Y. Rogers. 2009. Around the table: are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions? In Proceedings of CSCL.
26. S. E. Higgins, E. Mercier, E. Burd, and A. Hatch. 2011. Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: A synthethic review. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6, 4 (2011), 515--538.
27. U. Hinrichs and S. Carpendale. 2011. Gestures in the wild: Studying multi-touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM.
28. R. Y. Hirokawa, R. S. Cathcart, L. A. Samovar, and L. D. Henman (Eds.). 2003. Small Group Communication: Theory 8 Practice: An Anthology. Oxford University Press, 8 edition.
29. G. Hofstede. 2001. Culture consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publication.
30. G. Hofstede. 2011. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2, 1 (2011), 1--26.
31. E. M. Huang, E. D. Mynatt, and J. P. Trimble. 2007. When design just isn't enough: The unanticipated challenges of the real world for large collaborative displays. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 7 (2007), 537--547.
32. K. Inkpen, J. McGrenere, K. S. Booth, and M. Klawe. 1997. The effect of turn-taking protocols on children's learning in mouse-driven collaborative environments. In Proceedings of GI. Canadian Information Processing Society.
33. I. Jamil, K. O’Hara, M. Perry, A. Karnik, and S. Subramanian. 2011. The effects of interaction techniques on talk patterns in collaborative peer learning around interactive tables. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 3043--3052.
34. I. Jamil, M. Perry, K. O’Hara, A. Karnik, M. T. Marshall, S. Jha, S. Gupta, and S. Subramanian. 2010. Group interaction on interactive multi-touch tables by children in India. In Proceedings of IDC. ACM.
35. D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson. 2009. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Researcher 38, 5 (2009), 365--379.
36. T. Jokela and A. Lucero. 2013. A comparative evaluation of touch-based methods to bind mobile devices for collaborative interactions. In Proceedings of CHI, Paris, France. ACM.
37. B. Jordan and A. Henderson. 1995. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of Learning Sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39--103.
38. A. Kharrufa, D. Leat, and P. Olivier. 2010. Digital mysteries: Designing for learning at the tabletop. In Proceedings of ITS. ACM, 197--206.
39. D. Klinkhammer, M. Nitsche, M. Specht, and H. Reiterer. 2011. Adaptive personal territories for co-located tabletop interaction in a museum setting. In Proceedings of ITS. ACM.
40. K. N. Laland, J. Odling-Smee, and M. W. Feldman. 2000. Niche construction biological evolution and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000), 131--175.
41. M. Lee. 1993. Gender, group composition and peer interaction in computer-based cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 9, 4 (1993), 547--577.
42. X. Li, T. J. Hess, A. L. McNab, and Y. Yu. 2009. Culture and acceptance of global web sites: A cross-country study of the effects of national cultural values on acceptance of a personal web portal. SIGMIS Database 40, 4 (2009), 49--74.
43. H. H. Lund and M. Vesisenaho. 2004. I-blocks in an African context. In Proceedings of ISAROB.
44. R. M. Maldonado, J. Kay, and K. Yacef. 2010. Collaborative concept mapping at the tabletop. In Proceedings of ITS. ACM, 207--210.
45. P. Marshall, R. Fleck, A. Harris, J. Rick, E. Hornecker, Y. Rogers, N. Yuill, and N. S. Dalton. 2009. Fighting for control: Children's embodied interactions when using physical and digital representations. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM.
46. P. Marshall, E. Hornecker, R. Morris, N. Sheep Dalton, and Y. Rogers. 2008. When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems, TABLETOP’08.
47. P. Marshall, R. Morris, Y. Rogers, S. Kreitmayer, and M. Davies. 2011. Rethinking ‘multi-user’: An in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM.
48. E. M. Mercier, S. E. Higgins, and A. Joyce-Gibbons. 2016. The effects of room design on computer-supported collaborative learning in a multi-touch classroom. Interactive Learning Environments 24, 3 (2016), 504--522.
49. T. Mori, K. Hamana, C. Feng, and J. I. Hoshino. 2010. Narrative entertainment system with tabletop interface. In Proceedings of Entertainment Computing, ICEC’10, H. Yang, R. Malaka, J. Hoshino, and J. Han (Eds.). Berlin, Springer, 6243, 422--424.
50. M. R. Morris, K. Ryall, C. Shen, C. Forlines, and F. Vernier. 2001. Beyond social protocols: Multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware. In Proceedings of CSCW. ACM.
51. T. Nagel, L. Pschetz, M. Stefaner, M. Halkia, and B. Müller. 2009. Mæve -- An interactive tabletop installation for exploring background information in exhibitions. Ambient, Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction 5612, 1 (2009), 483--491.
52. R. E. Nisbett. 2003. The Geography of Thought. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
53. J. D. A. C. Novak and J. Alberto. 2008. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. IHMC.
54. I. C. Olson, Z. A. Leong, U. Wilensky, and M. S. Horn. 2011. It's just a toolbar! using tangibles to help children manage conflict around a multi-touch tabletop. In Proceedings of TEI. ACM.
55. U. S. Pawar, J. Pal, R. Gupta, and K. Toyama. 2007. Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM.
56. P. L. Peterson and S. R. Swing. 1985. Students cognitions as mediators of the effectiveness of small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 3 (1985), 299--312.
57. S. Price and Y. Rogers. 2004. Let's get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers and Education 43 (2004), 137--151.
58. K. Reinecke. 2012. Automatic adaptation of user interfaces to cultural preferences. Information Technology 54, 2 (2012), 96--100.
59. K. Reinecke and A. Bernstein. 2011. Improving performance, perceived usability and aesthetics with culturally adaptive user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 2 (2011), Article 8.
60. J. Rick, P. Marshall, and N. Yuill. 2011. Beyond one-size-fits-all: How interactive tabletops support collaborative learning. In Proceedings of IDC. ACM.
61. Y. Rogers, W. Hazlewood, E. Blevis, and Y.-K. Lim. 2004. Finger talk: Collaborative decision-making using talk and fingertip interaction around a tabletop display. In Proceedings of CHI, Vienna, Austria. ACM.
62. Y. Rogers, Y. K. Lim, W. Hazlewood, and P. Marshall. 2009. Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single user displays? Human-Computer Interaction 24, 2 (2009), 79--116.
63. L. Scissors, N. S. Shami, T. Ishihara, S. Rohall, and S. Saito. 2011. Real-time collaborative editing behavior in USA and Japanese distributed teams. In Proceedings of CHI, Vancouver, BC, Canada. ACM, 1119--1128.
64. S. Scott, M. Sheelagh, T. Carpendale, and K. Inkpen. 2004. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proceedings of CSCW, Chicago, IL, USA. ACM, 294--303.
65. S. D. Scott, K. D. Grant, and R. L. Mandryk. 2003. System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In Proceedings of ECSCW. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 159--178.
66. L. Setlock and S. Fussell. 2011. Culture or fluency?: Unpacking interactions between culture and communication medium. In Proceedings of CHI, Vancouver, BC, Canada. ACM, 1137--1140.
67. S. Sharan and H. Shachar. 1988. Language and Learning in the Cooperative Classroom. Springer.
68. R. Sommer. 1959. Studies in personal space. Sociometry 22, 3 (1959), 247--260.
69. R. Sommer. 1969. Personal Space: The Behavioral Basis of Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
70. G. Stahl. 2006. Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. MIT Press.
71. S. Stemler. 2001. An overview of content analysis. Journal of Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7, 17 (June 2001). Accessed Online at: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=78n=17.
72. J. Stewart, B. B. Bederson, and A. Druin. 1999. Single display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration. In Proceedings. of CHI. ACM.
73. J. Stewart, E. M. Raybourn, B. Bederson, and A. Druin. 1998. When two hands are better than one: Enhancing collaboration using single display groupware. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM.
74. O. Stock, M. Zancanaro, C. Koren, C. Rocchi, Z. Eisikovits, D. Goren-bar, D. Tomasini, and P. Weiss. 2008. A co-located interface for narration to support reconciliation in a conflict: Initial results from Jewish and Palestinian youth. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM, 1583--1592.
75. C. M. Super and S. Harkness. 1997. The cultural structuring of child development. In Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Basic Processes and Human Development, Vol. 2. J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, and J. Pandey (Eds.). Chapter 1. Pearson.
76. C. B. Thompson. 2009. Descriptive data analysis. Air Medical Journal 28, 2 (2009), 56--59.
77. J. R. Wallace and S. D. Scott. 2008. Contextual design considerations for co-located, collaborative tables. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems, TABLETOP’08, IEEE.
78. N. Webb. 1982a. Group composition, group interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 4 (1982), 475--484.
79. N. Webb. 1982b. Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research 74, 5 (1982), 642--655.
80. N. M. Webb. 1982c. Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research 52, 3 (1982), 421--445.
81. A. Weinberger and N. Nistor. 2010. Culture, profession, and attitudes towards educational technology: A large-scale, german-romanian study. In Proceedings of ICIC. ACM, 199--202.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing