skip to main content
10.1145/3095713.3095719acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescbmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The 3D-Pitoti Dataset: A Dataset for high-resolution 3D Surface Segmentation

Published:19 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The development of powerful 3D scanning hardware and reconstruction algorithms has strongly promoted the generation of 3D surface reconstructions in different domains. An area of special interest for such 3D reconstructions is the cultural heritage domain, where surface reconstructions are generated to digitally preserve historical artifacts. While reconstruction quality nowadays is sufficient in many cases, the robust analysis (e.g. segmentation, matching, and classification) of reconstructed 3D data is still an open topic. In this paper, we target the automatic segmentation of high-resolution 3D surface reconstructions of petroglyphs. To foster research in this field, we introduce a fully annotated, large-scale 3D surface dataset including high-resolution meshes, depth maps and point clouds as a novel benchmark dataset, which we make publicly available. Additionally, we provide baseline results for a random forest as well as a convolutional neural network based approach. Results show the complementary strengths and weaknesses of both approaches and point out that the provided dataset represents an open challenge for future research.

References

  1. I. Armeni, Alexander. Sax, A. R Zamir, and S. Savarese. 2017. Joint 2D-3D-Semantic Data for Indoor Scene Understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.01105 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. L. Blunt and X. Jiang. 2003. Advanced techniques for assessment surface topography: development of a basis for 3D surface texture standards "surfstand". Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Samuel Rota Bulò and Peter Kontschieder. 2014. Neural Decision Forests for Semantic Image Labelling. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Liang-Chieh Chen, George Papandreou, Iasonas Kokkinos, Kevin Murphy, and Alan L. Yuille. 2015. Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFs. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kristin J. Dana, Bram van Ginneken, Shree K. Nayar, and Jan J. Koenderink. 1999. Reflectance and Texture of Real-World Surfaces. ACM Trans. on Graphics 18, 1 (1999), 1--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michael Firman. 2016. RGBD Datasets: Past, Present and Future. In CVPR Workshop on Large Scale 3D Data: Acquisition, Modelling and Analysis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Haindl and S. Mikeš. 2008. Texture Segmentation Benchmark. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Robert M. Haralick, K. Sam Shanmugam, and Its'hak Dinstein. 1973. Textural Features for Image Classification. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 3, 6 (1973), 610--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bharath Hariharan, Pablo Andrés Arbeláez, Ross B. Girshick, and Jitendra Malik. 2015. Hypercolumns for object segmentation and fine-grained localization. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Paul Jaccard. 1912. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytologist 11, 2 (1912), 37--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Allison Janoch, Sergey Karayev, Yangqing Jia, Jonathan T. Barron, Mario Fritz, Kate Saenko, and Trevor Darrell. 2011. A category-level 3-D object dataset: Putting the Kinect to work. In ICCV Workshop on Consumer Depth Cameras for Computer Vision. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yangqing Jia, Evan Shelhamer, Jeff Donahue, Sergey Karayev, Jonathan Long, Ross Girshick, Sergio Guadarrama, and Trevor Darrell. 2014. Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5093 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Peter Kontschieder, Samuel Rota Bulò, Marcello Pelillo, and Horst Bischof. 2014. Structured Labels in Random Forests for Semantic Labelling and Object Detection. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 36, 10 (2014), 2104--2116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Peter Kontschieder, Pushmeet Kohli, Jamie Shotton, and Antonio Criminisi. 2013. GeoF: Geodesic Forests for Learning Coupled Predictors. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2012. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dmitry Laptev and Joachim M. Buhmann. 2014. Convolutional Decision Trees for Feature Learning and Segmentation. In Proc. German Conf. on Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 11 (1998), 2278--2324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Guosheng Lin, Chunhua Shen, Anton van dan Hengel, and Ian Reid. 2016. Efficient piecewise training of deep structured models for semantic segmentation. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, and Trevor Darrell. 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Roozbeh Mottaghi, Xianjie Chen, Xiaobai Liu, Nam-Gyu Cho, Seong-Whan Lee, Sanja Fidler, Raquel Urtasun, and Alan L. Yuille. 2014. The Role of Context for Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation in the Wild. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pushmeet Kohli Nathan Silberman, Derek Hoiem and Rob Fergus. 2012. Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images. In Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Timo Ojala, Topi Mäenpää, Matti Pietikäinen, Jaakko Viertola, Juha Kyllönen, and Sami Huovinen. 2002. Outex- New Framework for Empirical Evaluation of Texture Analysis Algorithms. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Timo Ojala and Matti Pietikäinen. 1999. Unsupervised texture segmentation using feature distributions. Pattern Recognition 32, 3 (1999), 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Radu Bogdan Rusu, Zoltan Csaba Marton, Nico Blodow, Mihai Dolha, and Michael Beetz. 2008. Towards 3D point cloud based object maps for household environments. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 56, 11 (2008), 927--941. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Evan Shelhamer, Jonathan Long, and Trevor Darrell. 2016. Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence PP, 99 (2016), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Nathan Silberman and Rob Fergus. 2011. Indoor scene segmentation using a structured light sensor. In ICCV Workshop on 3D Representation and Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Shuran Song, Samuel P. Lichtenberg, and Jianxiong Xiao. 2015. SUN RGB-D: A RGB-D scene understanding benchmark suite. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Changchang Wu. 2013. Towards Linear-Time Incremental Structure from Motion. In 3D Vision - 3DV 2013, 2013 International Conference on. 127--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Matthias Zeppelzauer, Georg Poier, Markus Seidl, Christian Reinbacher, Christian Breiteneder, Horst Bischof, and Samuel Schulter. 2015. Interactive Segmentation of Rock-Art in High-Resolution 3D Reconstructions. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Digital Heritage. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Matthias Zeppelzauer, Georg Poier, Markus Seidl, Christian Reinbacher, Samuel Schulter, Christian Breiteneder, and Horst Bischof. 2016. Interactive 3D Segmentation of Rock-Art by Enhanced Depth Maps and Gradient Preserving Regularization. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) 9, 4 (2016), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Matthias Zeppelzauer and Markus Seidl. 2015. Efficient image-space extraction and representation of 3D surface topography. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Image Processing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Shuai Zheng, Sadeep Jayasumana, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Vibhav Vineet, Zhizhong Su, Dalong Du, Chang Huang, and Philip Torr. 2015. Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. on Computer Vision. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The 3D-Pitoti Dataset: A Dataset for high-resolution 3D Surface Segmentation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CBMI '17: Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing
        June 2017
        237 pages
        ISBN:9781450353335
        DOI:10.1145/3095713

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 June 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader