skip to main content
10.1145/3106426.3109439acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A knowledge-driven approach for personalized literature recommendation based on deep semantic discrimination

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 August 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The query and selection of scientific literatures are knowledge driven. Researchers regard public literature resources as target knowledge sources and use their own domain knowledge to explore in them. However, existing knowledge-driven methods of literature recommendation mainly focus on morphological matching and cannot effectively resolve polysemous phenomenon brought by "knowledge overload". Based on this observation, this paper presents a knowledge-driven approach for personalized literature recommendation. Domain ontology, synonyms and knowledge labels are integrated into a multidimensional domain knowledge map for modeling user knowledge requirements and literature contents based on deep semantic discrimination. The personalized recommendation is achieved by calculating knowledge distances between users and literatures. Experimental results on a real data set of PubMed show that the recommended relevance of the current method is 67%, better than other methods.

References

  1. Jun Zhao, Qian-Li Jin, and Bo Xu. Semantic computation for text retrieval. Jisuanji Xuebao(Chinese Journal of Computers), 28(12):2068--2078, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Justin Scott Giboney, Susan A Brown, Paul Benjamin Lowry, and Jay F Nunamaker. User acceptance of knowledge-based system recommendations: Explanations, arguments, and fit. Decision Support Systems, 72:1--10, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Wei Ding, Peng Liang, Antony Tang, and Hans Van Vliet. Knowledge-based approaches in software documentation: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 56(6):545--567, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Yuh-Jen Chen, Hui-Chuan Chu, Yuh-Min Chen, and Chung-Yueh Chao. Adapting domain ontology for personalized knowledge search and recommendation. Information & Management, 50(6):285--303, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Carmen Martinez-Cruz, Carlos Porcel, Juan Bernabé-Moreno, and Enrique Herrera-Viedma. A model to represent users trust in recommender systems using ontologies and fuzzy linguistic modeling. Information Sciences, 311:102--118, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Joeran Beel, Bela Gipp, Stefan Langer, and Corinna Breitinger. Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 17(4):305--338, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Weidong Zhao, Ran Wu, and Haitao Liu. Paper recommendation based on the knowledge gap between a researcher's background knowledge and research target. Information Processing & Management, 52(5):976--988, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Li-Ping Jing, Hou-Kuan Huang, and Hong-Bo Shi. Improved feature selection approach tfidf in text mining. In Proceedings. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, volume 2, pages 944--946 vol.2, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yuanyuan Zhang, James Z Wang, and Pradip K Srimani. Semantic graph based pseudo relevance feedback for biomedical information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Systems-Biology and Bioinformatics, pages 48--52. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gérald Kembellec, Imad Saleh, and Catherine Sauvaget. A model of cross language retrieval for it domain papers through a map of acm computing classification system. In Multimedia Computing and Systems, 2009. ICMCS'09. International Conference on, pages 162--168. ieee, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Adam Kilgarriff and Christiane Fellbaum. Wordnet: An electronic lexical database, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Maribel Acosta, Amrapali Zaveri, Elena Simperl, Dimitris Kontokostas, Fabian Flöck, and Jens Lehmann. Detecting linked data quality issues via crowdsourcing: A dbpedia study. Semantic Web, (Preprint):1--33, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jerrold R Turner. Pubmed, pubmed central, and impact factor. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2(5):537, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lidong Bing, Shan Jiang, Wai Lam, Yan Zhang, and Shoaib Jameel. Adaptive concept resolution for document representation and its applications in text mining. Knowledge-Based Systems, 74:1--13, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yu-Xiao Zhu and Lin-Yuan Lu. Evaluation metrics for recommender systems. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 41(2):163--175, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A knowledge-driven approach for personalized literature recommendation based on deep semantic discrimination

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WI '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence
      August 2017
      1284 pages
      ISBN:9781450349512
      DOI:10.1145/3106426

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 August 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      WI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate118of178submissions,66%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader