skip to main content
10.1145/3139958.3139991acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

An On-line Truthful and Individually Rational Pricing Mechanism for Ride-sharing

Published:07 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ride-sharing has the potential of addressing many socioeconomic challenges related to transportation. The rising popularity of ride-sharing platforms (e.g., Uber, Lyft, DiDi) in addition to the emergence of new applications like food delivery and grocery shopping which use a similar platform, calls for an in-depth and detailed evaluation of various aspects of this problem.

Auction frameworks and mechanism design, have been widely used for modeling ride-sharing platforms. A key challenge in these approaches is preventing the involving parties from manipulating the platform for their personal gain which in turn, can result in a less satisfactory experience for other parties and/or loss of profit for the platform provider. We introduce a latent space transition model for ride-sharing platforms which drivers can exploit and predict the future supply of the drivers (i.e., available drivers) to their own advantage. Following, we propose a pricing model for ride-sharing platforms which is both truthful and individually rational based on Vickery auctions and show how we can manage the loss of revenue in this approach. We compare our predicting model and pricing model with competing approaches through experiments on New York City's taxi dataset. Our results show that our model can accurately learn the transition patterns of people's ride requests. Furthermore, our pricing mechanism forces drivers to be truthful and takes away any unfair advantage the drivers can achieve by bidding untruthfully. More importantly, our pricing model forces truthfulness without sacrificing much profit unlike what is typical with second-price auction schemes.

References

  1. It's a beautiful (pool) day in the neighborhood, https://www.uber.com/blog/los-angeles/its-a-beautiful-pool-day-in-the-neighborhood/. Accessed: 2017-03-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nyc taxi trips. http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/html/about/trip_record_data.shtml. Accessed: 2017-03-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Asghari, M., Deng, D., Shahabi, C., Demiryurek, U., and Li, Y. Price-aware real-time ride-sharing at scale: An auction-based approach. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), GIS '16, ACM, pp. 3:1--3:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., and Jordan, M. I. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cheng, S.-F., Nguyen, D. T., and Lau, H. C. Mechanisms for arranging ride sharing and fare splitting for last-mile travel demands. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (Richland, SC, 2014), AAMAS '14, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1505--1506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chiang, M.-F., Hoang, T.-A., and Lim, E.-P. Where are the passengers?: A grid-based gaussian mixture model for taxi bookings. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2015), SIGSPATIAL '15, ACM, pp. 32:1--32:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cho, R., Myers, S. A., and Leskovec, J. Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2011), KDD '11, pp. 1082--1090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cici, B., Markopoulou, A., and Laoutaris, N. Designing an on-line ride-sharing system. In Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (2015), GIS '15, pp. 60:1--60:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Huang, Y., Bastani, F., Jin, R., and Wang, X.S. Large scale real-time ridesharing with service guarantee on road networks. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 7, 14 (2014), 2017--2028. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kamar, R., and Horvitz, R. Collaboration and shared plans in the open world: Studies of ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 21st International Jont Conference on Artifical Intelligence (San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009), IJCAT09, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp. 187--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kleiner, A., Nebel, B., and Ziparo, V. A. A mechanism for dynamic ride sharing based on parallel auctions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume One (2011), IJCAI'11, AAAI Press, pp. 266--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kullback, S., and Leibler, R. A. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22, 1 (03 1951), 79--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lagoudakis, M., Berhault, M., Koenig, S., Keskinocak, P., and Kleywegt, A. Simple auctions with performance guarantees for multi-robot task allocation. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004. (IROS 2004). Proceedings. 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on (Sept 2004), vol. 1, pp. 698--705 vol.1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lichman, M., and Smyth, P. Modeling human location data with mixtures of kernel densities. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2014), KDD '14, pp. 35--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ma, S., Zheng, Y., and Wolfson, O. Real-time city-scale taxi ridesharing. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27, 7 (2015), 1782--1795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mehta, A., Saberi, A., Vazirani, U., and Vazirani, V. Adwords and generalized on-line matching. In Foundations of Computer Science, 2005. FOCS 2005. 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on (Oct 2005), pp. 264--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Lathia, N., and Mascolo, C. Mining user mobility features for next place prediction in location-based services. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining (2012), ICDM '12, pp. 1038--1043. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C., and Guibas, L.J. A metric for distributions with applications to image databases. In Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) (Jan 1998), pp. 59--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Shen, W., Lopes, C. V., and Crandall, J. W. An online mechanism for ridesharing in autonomous mobility-on-demand systems. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016), IJCAI'16, AAAI Press, pp. 475--481. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wang, W., Yin, PL, Sadiq, S., Chen, L., Xie, M., and Zhou, X. Spore: A sequential personalized spatial item recommender system. In 2016 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) (May 2016), pp. 954--965.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yin, PL, Sun, Y., Cui, B., Hu, Z., and Chen, L. Lcars: A location-content-aware recommender system. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2013), KDD '13, pp. 221--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Yuan, Q., Cong, G., Ma, Z., Sun, A., and Thalmann, N. M. Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2013), SIGIR '13, pp. 363--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Zhang, J.-D., Chow, C.-Y., and Li, Y. Lore: Exploiting sequential influence for location recommendations. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (2014), SIGSPATIAL '14, pp. 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Zhao, D., Ramchurn, S. D., and Jennings, N. R. Incentive design for ridesharing with uncertainty. In arXiv preprint arXiv: 1505.01617 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An On-line Truthful and Individually Rational Pricing Mechanism for Ride-sharing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGSPATIAL '17: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
        November 2017
        677 pages
        ISBN:9781450354905
        DOI:10.1145/3139958

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 November 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGSPATIAL '17 Paper Acceptance Rate39of193submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader