skip to main content
10.1145/3154273.3154328acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicdcnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Opportunistic Power Savings with Coordinated Control in Data Center Networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 January 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a holistic power management of the data center network (DCN) via coordination among distinct controllers with different functionality and scope. This includes - a local controller (LC) that has visibility only at individual switch/router level, a global controller (GC) that has a global view of the network, and a hint based topology aware user request assignment controller (RAC) that controls placement of the external requests on the endpoint hosts. The key function of these controllers from energy management perspective is to properly direct and consolidate network traffic to maximize low power (or "sleep") opportunities for the network interfaces. We show that the coordinated "hints" provided by the GC are vital to correct the myopic view of LCs and RAC for both avoiding congestion and maximizing network sleep opportunities. We show that these mechanisms can reduce power consumption by upto ~45% in the common fat-tree based DCNs using the low power idle (LPI) feature of the Ethernet.

References

  1. Caida data server. http://data.caida.org/datasets/passive/passive-oc48/20020814-160000.UTC/pcap/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Abts et al. Energy proportional datacenter networks. SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, 38(3):338--347, June 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Al-Fares et al. Hedera: Dynamic flow scheduling for data center networks. In USENIX NSDI, pages 19--19, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Blanquicet et al. An initial performance evaluation of rapid phy selection (rps) for energy efficient ethernet. In IEEE LCN, pages 223--225, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. E. Brown, R. Brown, E. Masanet, B. Nordman, B. Tschudi, A. Shehabi, J. Stanley, J. Koomey, D. Sartor, P. Chan, and E. I. U. E. P. A. et al. with Alliance to Save Energy, ICF Incorporated. Report to Congress on Server and Data Center Energy Efficiency: Public Law 109--431. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen et al. Ieee 802.3 az: the road to energy efficient ethernet. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(11), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Erickson et al. Using Network Knowledge to Improve Workload Performance in Virtualized Data Centers. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao et al. Energy-aware load balancing in heterogeneous cloud data centers. In ACM ICMSS, pages 80--84, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Greenberg et al. The cost of a cloud: Research problems in data center networks. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 39(1):68--73, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Gupta et al. Using low-power modes for energy conservation in ethernet lans. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 2451--2455, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Jin et al. Joint host-network optimization for energy-efficient data center networking. In IEEE IPDPS, pages 623--634, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Kant. Multistate power management of communications links. In Proc. of COMSNET, 01 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Li et al. Joint power optimization through vm placement and flow scheduling in data centers. In IEEE IPCCC, pages 1--8, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Liu et al. Greencloud: A new architecture for green data center. In ACM ICAC-INDST, pages 29--38, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. Mahadevan et al. On energy efficiency for enterprise and data center networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(8):94--100, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Meng et al. Improving the scalability of data center networks with traffic-aware virtual machine placement. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1154--1162, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mostowfi et al. A simulation study of energy-efficient ethernet with two modes of low-power operation. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(10):1702--1705, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mostowfi et al. An analytical model for the power consumption of dual-mode eee. Electronics Letters, 52(15):1308--1310, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Murugan et al. On the interconnect energy efficiency of high end computing systems. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, April 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nedevschi et al. Reducing network energy consumption via sleeping and rate-adaptation. In USENIX NSDI, pages 323--336, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paya et al. Energy-aware load balancing and application scaling for the cloud ecosystem. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. L. R. Rabiner et al. An introduction to hidden markov models. IEEE ASSp Magazine, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Raghavendra et al. No power struggles: Coordinated multi-level power management for the data center. In ACM ASPLOS, pages 48--59, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Riley et al. The ns-3 network simulator. Modeling and tools for network simulation, pages 15--34, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sohan et al. Characterizing 10 gbps network interface energy consumption. In IEEE LCN, pages 268--271, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sondur et al. Implementing data center energy management capabilities in ns3. In publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. C. Thaenchaikun et al. Augmenting the energy-saving impact of ieee 802.3az via the control plane. In IEEE ICCW, pages 2843--2849, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Travostino et al. Seamless live migration of virtual machines over the man/wan. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 22(8):901--907, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Verma et al. pmapper: power and migration cost aware application placement in virtualized systems. In ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware, pages 243--264, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. X. Wang et al. Carpo: Correlation-aware power optimization in data center networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1125--1133, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. K. Zheng et al. Joint power optimization of data center network and servers with correlation analysis. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 2598--2606, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Opportunistic Power Savings with Coordinated Control in Data Center Networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICDCN '18: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking
          January 2018
          494 pages
          ISBN:9781450363723
          DOI:10.1145/3154273

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 January 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader