skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3186325acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel
Public Access

Panel: Extending Conversations about Gender and HCI

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This panel aims to create a space for participants at CHI 2018 to see how far we have come as a community in raising and addressing issues of gender, and how far we have yet to go. Our intent is for open discussion to support the community's intentions to move towards greater equity, inclusivity, and diversity.

References

  1. A. Bradley, C. MacArthur, M. Hancock, S. Carpendale. 2015. Gendered or neutral? considering the language of HCI. Proc. Graphics Interface, 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Moss-Racusin, J. Dovidio, V. Brescoll, M. Graham, and J. Handelsman. 2012. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474--16479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. Balaam and L. Koefoed Hansen. Women's Health at CHI. A blog post for Interaction. XXV.1 Jan + Feb 2018. http://tinyurl.com/yb3swr9pGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Bardzell and J. Bardzell (2011). Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: Social Science, Feminism, and HCI. Proc. CHI'11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Beckwith, M. Burnett, S. Wiedenbeck, C. Cook, S. Sorte, and M. Hastings. 2005. Effectiveness of end-user debugging software features: Are there gender issues? Proc. CHI'05, 869--878. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Burnett, L. Beckwith, S. Wiedenbeck, S. Fleming, J. Cao, T. Park, V. Grigoreanu, K. Rector. 2011. Gender pluralism in problem-solving software. Interacting with Computers 23(5) 450--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Burnett, S. Stumpf, J. Macbeth, S. Makri, L. Beckwith, I. Kwan, A. Peters, and W. Jernigan. 2016. GenderMag: A method for evaluating software's gender inclusiveness. Interacting with Computers 28(6) 760--787.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Burnett, A. Peters, C. Hill, and N. Elarief. 2016. Finding gender inclusiveness software issues with GenderMag: A field investigation. Proc. CHI'16, 2586--2598. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Mendez, H. S. Pedala, Z. Steine-Hanson, C. Hilderbrand, A. Horvath, C. Hill, L. Simpson, N. Patil, A. Sarma, M. Burnett, 2018. Open Source barriers to entry, revisited: A sociotechnical perspective, Proc. ICSE'18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. I. Buskens. 2015. Infusing a Gender Perspective in Indigenous Knowledge Technology Design: Some Reflections and Suggestions, in N. J. Bidwell and H. Winschiers-Theophilius (eds), At the Intersections of Indigenous and Traditional Knowledges and Technology Design, Informing Science Press, Informing Science Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. Proc. CHI'10, 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Ahmed. 2017. Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Panel: Extending Conversations about Gender and HCI

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      3155 pages
      ISBN:9781450356213
      DOI:10.1145/3170427

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • panel

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader