skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3186493acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Demonstrating Reality-Based Information Retrieval

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

With this work, we demonstrate our concept of Reality-Based Information Retrieval. Our principal idea is to bring Information Retrieval closer to the real world, for a new class of future, immersive IR interfaces. Technological advances in computer vision and machine learning will allow mobile Information Retrieval to make even better use of the people's surroundings and their ability to interact with the physical world. Reality-Based Information Retrieval augments the classic Information Retrieval process with context-dependent search cues and situated query and result visualizations using Augmented Reality technologies. We briefly describe our concept as an extension of the Information Retrieval pipeline and present two prototype implementations that showcase the potential of Reality-Based Information Retrieval.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

demo1837-file4.mp4

mp4

31.5 MB

demo1837-file6.mp4

mp4

15.5 MB

References

  1. Antti Ajanki, Mark Billinghurst, Toni Järvenpää, Melih Kandemir, Samuel Kaski, Markus Koskela, Mikko Kurimo, Jorma Laaksonen, Kai Puolamäki, Teemu Ruokolainen, and others. 2010. Contextual information access with augmented reality. In Proc. 2010 IEEE Int. Workshop MLSP. IEEE, 95--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Mark Billinghurst, Adrian Clark, and Gun Lee. 2015. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8, 2-3 (March 2015), 73--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Wolfgang Büschel, Annett Mitschick, and Raimund Dachselt. 2018. Here and Now: Reality-Based Information Retrieval. In Proc. CHIIR '18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Neven ElSayed, Bruce Thomas, Kim Marriott, Julia Piantadosi, and Ross Smith. 2015. Situated Analytics. In 2015 Big Data Visual Analytics (BDVA). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett Ens and Pourang Irani. 2017. Spatial Analytic Interfaces: Spatial User Interfaces for In Situ Visual Analytics. IEEE Comp. Graph. Appl. 37, 2 (2017), 66--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Xin Fan, Xing Xie, Zhiwei Li, Mingjing Li, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2005. Photo-to-search: Using Multimodal Queries to Search the Web from Mobile Devices. In Proc. MIR '05. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Masakazu Iwamura, Kai Kunze, Yuya Kato, Yuzuko Utsumi, and Koichi Kise. 2014. Haven't We Met Before?: A Realistic Memory Assistance System to Remind You of the Person in Front of You. In Proc. AH '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bradley J. Rhodes and Pattie Maes. 2000. Just-in-time Information Retrieval Agents. IBM Syst. J. 39, 3-4 (July 2000), 685--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Demonstrating Reality-Based Information Retrieval

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      3155 pages
      ISBN:9781450356213
      DOI:10.1145/3170427

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • demonstration

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader