skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3188487acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract
Public Access

AI-Supported Messaging: An Investigation of Human-Human Text Conversation with AI Support

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite a growing body of research about the design and use of conversational agents, existing work has almost exclusively focused on interactions between an agent and a human. Less is known about how an agent is perceived and used during human-human conversation. We compared conversations between dyads using AI-assisted and standard messaging apps and elicited qualitative feedback from users of the AI-assisted messaging app through interviews. We find discrepancies between the AI assistant's suggestions and the conversational content, which is also reflected in participant interviews. Our results are used to suggest some areas for improvement and future work in AI-assisted communication.

References

  1. Petter Bae Brandtzæg and Asbjørn Følstad. 2017. "Why People Use Chatbots." In International Conference on Internet Science, 377--392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. David Coniam. 2014. "The linguistic accuracy of chatbots: usability from an ESL perspective." Text & Talk 34(5), 545--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Asbjørn Følstad and Petter Bae Brandtzæg. 2017. "Chatbots and the new world of HCI." interactions 24(4), 38--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Katherine Ibister, Hideyuki Nakanishi, Toru Ishida, and Cliff Nass. 2000. "Helper Agent: Designing an Assistant for Human-Human Interaction in a Virtual Meeting Space". CHI Letters 2(1), 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nathan Ingraham. 2016. "Google stores 'transient' Allo messages until you delete them". Engadget. https://www.engadget.com/2016/09/21/googleallo-messages-privacy/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Joseph Kim and Julie A. Shah. 2016. "Improving Team's Consistency of Understanding in Meetings". IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 46(5), 625--637.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lorenz Cuno Klopfenstein, Saverio Delpriori, Silvia Malatini, and Alessandro Bogliolo. 2017. "The Rise of Bots: A Survey of Conversational Interfaces, Patterns, and Paradigms." In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 555--565. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Daniel T. L. Shek. 2002. "Chinese adolescents' explanations of poverty: The perceived causes of poverty scale". Adolescence 37(148), 789--803.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Aaron Smith. 2011. "Americans and Text Messaging". Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/09/19/americans-and-text-messaging/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tom Simonite. 2017. "Facebook's Perfect, Impossible Chatbot". MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604117/facebooks-perfect-impossible-chatbot.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. AI-Supported Messaging: An Investigation of Human-Human Text Conversation with AI Support

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      3155 pages
      ISBN:9781450356213
      DOI:10.1145/3170427

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader