skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173871acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Exploring the Value of Parent Tracked Baby Data in Interactions with Healthcare Professionals: A Data-Enabled Design Exploration

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a designerly exploration of the potential values of parent-tracked baby data in interactions between parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Where previous work has used parent-tracked data as part of the solution to a problem, we contribute by starting our design exploration from data, using it as creative material in our design process. As we intend to work towards a system that could be viable across different levels of care, we invited three different types of HCPs and five families with newborns, for a five-week situated design exploration. Facilitated by an open and dynamic data collection toolkit, parents and HCPs could together decide what data to collect. In a continuous dialogue, they reflected on the relevance of that data in their interaction. Based on this, we continuously and remotely developed two concepts.

References

  1. Margunn Aanestad. 2003. The Camera as an Actor Designin-Use of Telemedicine Infrastructure in Surgery. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12, 1: 1- 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, Anna L Cox and Yunan Chen. 2017. Quantifying the Body and Caring for the Mind: SelfTracking in Multiple Sclerosis. In proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'17, 6889--6901. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Apple. 2017. A bold way to look at your health. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://www.apple.com/ios/health/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sander Bogers, Joep Frens, Janne van Kollenburg, Eva Deckers, and Caroline Hummels, 2016. Connected Baby Bottle: A design case study towards a framework for dataenabled design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'16), 301--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chia-Fang Chung, Jonathan Cook, Elizabeth Bales, Jasmine Zia, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. More than telemonitoring: Health provider use and nonuse of life-log data in irritable bowel syndrome and weight management. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(8).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chia-Fang Chung, Kristin Dew, Allison Cole, Jasmine Zia, James Fogarty, Julie A. Kientz and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Boundary negotiating artifacts in personal informatics: Patient-provider collaboration with patient-generated data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on ComputerSupported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mary Jo Deering, Erin Siminerio, and Scott Weinstein. 2013. Issue Brief: Patient-Generated Health Data and Health IT. Office of the National Coordinator for HealthInformation TechnologyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Biplap Deka. 2016. Data-driven Mobile App Design. In Proceedings of the User Interface Software and Technology Symposium --UIST '16 Adjunct, 21--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Daniel A. Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. A Lived Informatics Model of Personal Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '15). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Espressif Systems IOT Team. 2017. ESP8266EX Datasheet. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://cdnshop.adafruit.com/product-files/2471/0AESP8266__Datasheet__EN_v4.3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitbit. Find your fit. 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from www.fitbit.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Glow Inc. 2017.Glow Baby - Baby Tracker App. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/id1077177456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stefan Hirschauer. 1991. The Manufacture of Bodies in Surgery. Social Studies of Science 21, 2: 297--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Nicholas Huba, and Yan Zhang. 2012. Designing patientcentered personal health records (PHRs): health care professionals' perspective on patient generated data. Journal of Medical Systems 36, 6: 3893--3905. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kelly Joyce. 2005. Appealing Images: Magnetic Resonance Imagining and the Production of Authoritative Knowledge. Social Studies of Science 35, 3: 437--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Marije Kanis, Saskia Robben, Judith Hagen, Anne Bimmerman, Natasja Wagelaar and Ben Kröse. 2013. Sensor Monitoring in the Home: Giving Voice to Elderly People. In proceedings of conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 97--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Bonnie Kaplan. 1995. Objectification and negotiation in interpreting clinical images: implications for computerbased patient records. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 7, 5: 439--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Julie Kientz, Rosa Arriaga, Gregory Abowd. 2009. Baby Steps: Evaluation of a System to Support Record-Keeping for Parents of Young Children. In Proceedings of the 2009 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'09, 1713--1722. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Soo-Cheol Kim, Young-Sik Jeong, Sang-Oh Park. 2013. RFID-based indoor location tracking to ensure the safety of the elderly in smart home environments. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17:1699--1707. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yoojung Kim, Eunyoung Heo, Hyunjeong Lee, Sookyoung Ji, Jueun Choi, Jeong-Whun Kim, Joongseek Lee, Sooyoung Yoo. Prescribing 10,000 Steps like Aspirin: Designing a Novel Interface for Data-Driven Medical Consultation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'17, 5797- 5796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Predrag Klasnja and Wanda Pratt. 2012. Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the Space of Mobile-phone Health Interventions. J Biomet Inform 45, 1: 184--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Janne van Kollenburg, Sander Bogers, Eva Deckers, Joep Frens, Caroline Hummels. 2017. How Design-inclusive UXR Influenced the Integration of Project Activities: Three Design Cases from Industry. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'17, 1408--1418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt and Julie Kientz. 2014. Understanding Quantifiedselfers' Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 2014 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'14, 1143- 1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stagebased model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp'11, 405- 414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Life'n Stats LLC. 2017. MammaBaby - Breast feeding App & Baby Log Tracker. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/mammababy-breastfeeding-app-baby-log-tracker/id618601202?mt=8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Máxima Medisch Centrum. 2017. De METC van het Máxima Medisch Centrum. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://www.mmc.nl/professionals/wetenschappelijk_onder zoek_in_mmc/metc/introductie.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Helena Mentis, Anita Komlodi, Katrina Schrader, Michael Phipps, Ann Gruber-Baldini, Karen Yarbrough and Lisa Shulman. 2017. Crafting a View of Self-Tracking Data in the Clinical Visit. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'17, 5800--5812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Gina Neff and Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Nighp Software LLC. 2017. Baby Tracker (Feed timer, sleep, diaper log). Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/baby-tracker-feed-timersleep-diaper-log/id779656557?mt=8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Nokia. 2017. An ideal weight loss companion. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://health.nokia.com/us/en/body-plus.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun Young Park, Hee Young Jeong, John Zimmerman. 2008. ENSURE: Support for Parents in Managing their Children's Health. In \Proceedings of the Conference on Design and Emotion. The Design and Emotion Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Philips AVENT. 2017. Philips AVENT. Retrieved January 22, 2017 from http://www.philips.co.uk/c-m-mo/philipsavent-and-your-baby.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Philips AVENT. 2017. uGrow- the world's first medical baby app with connected devices giving you personal advice that matters. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://www.philips.co.uk/c-m-mo/ugrow-healthy-babydevelopment-app.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Amit Prasad. 2005. Making Images/Making Bodies: Visibilizing and Disciplining through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Science, Technology & Human Values 30, 2: 291--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. D.A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Jelle Stienstra, Sander Bogers, Joep Frens. 2015. Designerly Handles: Dynamic and Contextualized Enablers for Interaction Designers. In Proceedings of Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement 2015. 86--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Hyewon Suh, John Porter, Alexis Hiniker, Julie Kientz. 2014. @BabySteps: Design and Evaluation of a System for using Twitter for Tracking Children's Developmental Milestones. In Proceedings of the 2014 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'14, 2279- 2288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Emanuel Vonach, Marianne Ternek, Georg Gerstweiler, Hannes Kaufmann. 2016. Design of a Health Monitoring Toy for Children. In Proceedings of the 2016 Interaction Design and Children Conference - IDC'16, 58--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Keiji Hirata, Takashi Kudo, Eiji Aramaki and Kazuki Hattori. 2017. Changing Moods: How Manual Tracking by Family Caregivers Improves Caring and Family Communication. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'17, 158--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Haining Zhu, Joanna Colgan, Madhu Reddy, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2016. Sharing Patient-Generated Data in Clinical Practices: An Interview Study. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings American Medical Informatics Association, 1303--1312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Value of Parent Tracked Baby Data in Interactions with Healthcare Professionals: A Data-Enabled Design Exploration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader