skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174130acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring, Understanding, and Classifying News Media Sympathy on Twitter after Crisis Events

Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates bias in coverage between Western and Arab media on Twitter after the November 2015 Beirut and Paris terror attacks. Using two Twitter datasets covering each attack, we investigate how Western and Arab media differed in coverage bias, sympathy bias, and resulting information propagation. We crowdsourced sympathy and sentiment labels for 2,390 tweets across four languages (English, Arabic, French, German), built a regression model to characterize sympathy, and thereafter trained a deep convolutional neural network to predict sympathy. Key findings show: (a) both events were disproportionately covered (b) Western media exhibited less sympathy, where each media coverage was more sympathetic towards the country affected in their respective region (c) Sympathy predictions supported ground truth analysis that Western media was less sympathetic than Arab media (d) Sympathetic tweets do not spread any further. We discuss our results in light of global news flow, Twitter affordances, and public perception impact.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn4389-file5.mp4

mp4

3.1 MB

References

  1. Sofiane Abbar, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Yacine Messaoui, and Javier Borge-Holthoefer. 2015. Consumers and Suppliers: Attention asymmetries. A Case Study of Aljazeera's News Coverage and Comments. In Computation+Journalism Symposium 2015. http://cj2015.brown.columbia.edu/papers/ consumers-and-suppliers.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Yelena Mejova, Sonia Alonso Saenz De Oger, and Braulio Gomez Fortes. 2016. Are You Charlie or Ahmed? Cultural Pluralism in Charlie Hebdo Response on Twitter. In Proc. ICWSM '16. 2--11. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM16/paper/ view/12997Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. David P. Baron. 2006. Persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics 90, 1--2 (January 2006), 1--36. https: //ideas.repec.org/a/eee/pubec/v90y2006i1--2p1--36.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jonah Berger and Katherine L. Milkman. 2012. What Makes Online Content Viral? Journal of Marketing Research 49, 2 (2012), 192--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shane Bergsma, Paul McNamee, Mossaab Bagdouri, Clayton Fink, and Theresa Wilson. 2012. Language identification for creating language-specific twitter collections. In Proc. LSM '12. ACL, 65--74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Javier Borge-Holthoefer, Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, and Ingmar Weber. 2015. Content and Network Dynamics Behind Egyptian Political Polarization on Twitter. In Proc. CSCW '15. ACM Press, 700--711. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Britz. 2015. Implementing a CNN for Text Classification in Tensorflow. (2015). https://github.com/dennybritz/cnn-text-classification-tfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Meeyoung Cha, Hamed Haddadi, Fabrício Benevenuto, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2010. Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower fallacy. In Proc. ICWSM '10. http://twitter.mpi-sws.org/icwsm2010_fallacy.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D D'Alessio and M Allen. 2000. Media bias in presidential elections: a meta-analysis. Journal of Comm. 50, 4 (2000), 133--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Alexander Dallmann, Florian Lemmerich, Daniel Zoller, and Andreas Hotho. 2015. Media Bias in German Online Newspapers. In Proc. HT '15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jean Decety and Thierry Chaminade. 2003. Neural correlates of feeling sympathy. Neuropsychologia 41, 2 (2003), 127--138. The cognitive neuroscience of social behavior.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mark Deuze. 2002. National news cultures: A comparison of Dutch, German, British, Australian, and US journalists. Journalism&Mass Communication Quarterly 79, 1 (2002), 134--149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nicholas Diakopoulos, Munmun De Choudhury, and Mor Naaman. 2012. Finding and Assessing Social Media Information Sources in the Context of Journalism. In Proc. CHI '12. ACM, 2451--2460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Nicholas Diakopoulos and Arkaitz Zubiaga. 2014. Newsworthiness and Network Gatekeeping on Twitter: The Role of Social Deviance.. In ICWSM '14. AAAI. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8065Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicholas A. Diakopoulos and David A. Shamma. 2010. Characterizing Debate Performance via Aggregated Twitter Sentiment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1195--1198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Júlio Cesar dos Reis, Fabrício Benevenuto, Pedro Olmo S. Vaz de Melo, Raquel O. Prates, Haewoon Kwak, and Jisun An. 2015. Breaking the News: First Impressions Matter on Online News., In Proc. ICWSM '15. CoRR (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07921Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R.A. Fisher. 1925. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh Oliver&Boyd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Johan Galtung and Mari Holmboe Ruge. 1965. The Structure of Foreign News: The Presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in Four Norwegian Newspapers. Journal of Peace Research 2, 1 (1965), 64--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. C.J. Glynn, S. Herbst, G.J. O'Keefe, and R.Y. Shapiro. 2004. Public Opinion. Westview Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=b3OqBAAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jennifer Golbeck and Derek Hansen. 2011. Computing Political Preference Among Twitter Followers. In Proc. CHI '11. ACM, 1105--1108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yoav Goldberg. 2015. A Primer on Neural Network Models for Natural Language Processing. CoRR abs/1510.00726 (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00726Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sandra González-Bailón, Ning Wang, Alejandro Rivero, Javier Borge-Holthoefer, and Yamir Moreno. 2014. Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks. Soc. Net. 38 (2014), 16--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Thomas Hanitzsch, Folker Hanusch, Claudia Mellado, Maria Anikina, Rosa Berganza, Incilay Cangoz, Mihai Coman, Basyouni Hamada, María Elena Hernández, Christopher D Karadjov, and others. 2011. Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies 12, 3 (2011), 273--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lars Kai Hansen, Adam Arvidsson, Finn Aarup Nielsen, Elanor Colleoni, and Michael Etter. 2011. Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 34--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. E.S. Herman and N. Chomsky. 1988. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books. https://books.google.de/books?id=Up5sAAAAIAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Isaac Johnson, Connor McMahon, Johannes Schöning, and Brent Hecht. 2017. The Effect of Population and "Structural" Biases on Social Media-based Algorithms: A Case Study in Geolocation Inference Across the Urban-Rural Spectrum. In Proc. CHI '17. ACM, 1167--1178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Isaac L. Johnson, Subhasree Sengupta, Johannes Schöning, and Brent Hecht. 2016. The Geography and Importance of Localness in Geotagged Social Media. In Proc. CHI '16. ACM, 515--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ankit Kariryaa, Isaac Johnson, Brent Hecht, and Johannes Schöning. 2018. Defining and Predicting the Localness of Volunteered Geographic Information using Ground Truth Data. In Proc. CHI '18. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification. In Proc. EMNLP '14, Alessandro Moschitti, Bo Pang, and Walter Daelemans (Eds.). ACL, 1746--1751. http://aclweb.org/anthology/D/D14/D14--1181.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Yonghwan Kim, Youngju Kim, Joong Suk Lee, Jeyoung Oh, and Na Yeon Lee. 2015. Tweeting the public: journalists' Twitter use, attitudes toward the public's tweets, and the relationship with the public. Information, Communication&Society 18, 4 (2015), 443--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. James T Kost and Michael P McDermott. 2002. Combining dependent P-values. Statistics&Probability Letters 60, 2 (2002), 183--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Haewoon Kwak and Jisun An. 2014a. SocInfo. Springer, Chapter A First Look at Global News Coverage of Disasters by Using the GDELT Dataset, 300--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Haewoon Kwak and Jisun An. 2014b. Understanding News Geography and Major Determinants of Global News Coverage of Disasters. CoRR abs/1410.3710 (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3710Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. V. I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals. Soviet Phys. Doklady. 10, 8 (Feb. 1966), 707--710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin, Yu-Ru and Margolin, Drew. 2014. The ripple of fear, sympathy and solidarity during the Boston bombings. EPJ Data Sci. 3, 1 (2014), 31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Gilad Lotan, Erhardt Graeff, Mike Ananny, Devin Gaffney, Ian Pearce, and danah boyd. 2011. The Arab Spring| The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions. International Journal of Communication 5, 0 (2011). http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Marco Lui and Timothy Baldwin. 2012. Langid.Py: An Off-the-shelf Language Identification Tool. In Proc. ACL '12 System Demonstrations. ACL, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 25--30. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2390470.2390475 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Walid Magdy, Kareem Darwish, Norah Abokhodair, Afshin Rahimi, and Timothy Baldwin. 2016. #ISISisNotIslam or #DeportAllMuslims?: Predicting Unspoken Views. In Proc. WebSci '16. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 95--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Winter Mason and Siddharth Suri. 2012. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 44, 1 (2012), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Yelena Mejova, Amy X. Zhang, Nicholas Diakopoulos, and Carlos Castillo. 2014. Controversy and sentiment in online news. Symposium on Computation and Journalism (2014). https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.8152Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. ICLR (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Soo Jung Moon and Patrick Hadley. 2014. Routinizing a New Technology in the Newsroom: Twitter as a News Source in Mainstream Media. Journal of Broadcasting&Electronic Media 58, 2 (2014), 289--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Jonathan Scott Morgan, Cliff Lampe, and Muhammad Zubair Shafiq. 2013. Is News Sharing on Twitter Ideologically Biased?. In Proc. CSCW '13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 887--896. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Alexandra Olteanu, Sarah Vieweg, and Carlos Castillo. 2015. What to Expect When the Unexpected Happens: Social Media Communications Across Crises. In Proc. CSCW '15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 994--1009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2, 1--2 (Jan. 2008), 1--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Souneil Park, Seungwoo Kang, Sangyoung Chung, and Junehwa Song. 2009. NewsCube: Delivering Multiple Aspects of News to Mitigate Media Bias. In Proc. CHI '09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 443--452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Richard M. Perloff. 2015. A Three-Decade Retrospective on the Hostile Media Effect. Mass Communication and Society 18, 6 (2015), 701--729.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Vincent Price and David Tewksbury. 1997. News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. Progress in communication sciences (1997), 173--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Diego Saez-Trumper, Carlos Castillo, and Mounia Lalmas. 2013. Social media news communities: gatekeeping, coverage, and statement bias. In Proc. CIKM '13. ACM, 1679--1684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Axel Schulz, T Thanh, H Paulheim, and Immanuel Schweizer. 2013. A fine-grained sentiment analysis approach for detecting crisis related microposts. ISCRAM 2013 (2013). http://idl.iscram.org/files/schulz/2013/ 927_Schulz_etal2013.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Elad Segev. 2015. Visible and invisible countries: News flow theory revised. Journalism 16, 3 (2015), 412--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2009. Tweet the Debates: Understanding Community Annotation of Uncollected Sources. In Proc. WSM '09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. P.J. Shoemaker and S.D. Reese. 1996. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. Longman. https://books.google.de/books?id=E_HtAAAAMAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. J. Singer. 2006. Journalists and News Bloggers: Complements, Contradictions and Challenges. In Uses of Blogs, A. Bruns and J. Jacobs (Eds.). Peter Lang, New York, 23--32. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/4024/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15 (2014), 1929--1958. http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/srivastava14a.html Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. 2012. (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising. In Proc. CSCW '12. ACM, 7--16. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2145212 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Saúl Vargas, Richard Mccreadie, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2016. Comparing Overall and Targeted Sentiments in Social Media during Crises. In Proc. ICWSM '16. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ ICWSM16/paper/view/13066Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Wayne Wanta, Guy Golan, and Cheolhan Lee. 2004. Agenda Setting and International News: Media Influence on Public Perceptions of Foreign Nations. Journalism&Mass Communication Quarterly 81, 2 (2004), 364--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Zhongyu Wei, Yulan He, Wei Gao, Binyang Li, Lanjun Zhou, and Kam-fai Wong. 2013. Mainstream Media Behavior Analysis on Twitter: A Case Study on UK General Election. In Proc. HT '13. ACM, 174--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. HD Wu. 2000. Systemic determinants of international news coverage: a comparison of 38 countries. Journal of Comm. 50, 2 (2000), 110--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Sevgi Yigit-Sert, Ismail Sengor Altingovde, and Özgür Ulusoy. 2016. Towards Detecting Media Bias by Utilizing User Comments. In Proc. WebSci '16. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 374--375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Arjumand Younus, Muhammad Atif Qureshi, Suneel Kumar Kingrani, Muhammad Saeed, Nasir Touheed, Colm O'Riordan, and Pasi Gabriella. 2012. Investigating Bias in Traditional Media Through Social Media. In Proc. WWW '12 Companion. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 643--644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Matthew D. Zeiler. 2012. ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method. CoRR abs/1212.5701 (2012). http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5701Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Measuring, Understanding, and Classifying News Media Sympathy on Twitter after Crisis Events

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader