skip to main content
10.1145/3196709.3196769acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Situated Exploration of Designing for Personal Health Ecosystems through Data-enabled Design

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a design case study from industry that explores designing for personal health ecosystems. Following on from previous work on ecologies that gives a predominantly theoretical perspective, we present a more applied and design-oriented perspective. To do so, we build on our previously-developed data-enabled design approach, which utilizes contextual, behavioral and experiential data from situated design experiments as creative material. This approach comprises two steps, of which this paper presents the first (contextual) step. We introduced a small adaptable ecosystem of multiple artifacts, in four family homes over a period of eight weeks, through which we explored and further expanded on valuable ecosystem relationships. The insights gained were translated into three design opportunities that inform a future second step. We highlight and discuss practical examples from our situated explorations, and discuss how our data-enabled design approach served in designing for the complexity and versatility inherent to these ecosystems.

References

  1. Amazon Digital Services LLC. 2017. Echo & Alexa. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://www.amazon.com/echoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beddit. 2017. Better Sleep starts with not thinking about it. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from Beddit.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eli Blevis, Susanne Bodker, John Flach, Jodi Forlizzi, Heekyoung Jung, Victor Kaptelinin, Bonnie Nardi and Antonio Rizzo. 2015. Ecological Perspectives in HCI, Promise, Problems, and Potential. In proceedings the Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'15), 2401--2404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Susanne Bodker and Clemens Nylandstad Klokmose. 2011.The Human-artifact model an activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Human-Computer Interaction 26(40), 315--371 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Susanne Bodker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2012. Dynamics in Artifact Ecologies. In proceedings of Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction NordiCHI'12, 448--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sander Bogers, Joep Frens, Janne van Kollenburg, Eva Deckers, Caroline Hummels. 2016. Connected Baby Bottle: A design case study towards a framework for data-enabled design. In proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'16), 301--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sander Bogers, Janne van Kollenburg, Joep Frens and Tom Djajadiningrat. 2016. Data-Enabled-Design, a Situated Exploration of Rich Interactions. In proceedings of the Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS'16), 45--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gerard Briscoe, Suzanne Sadedin and Philippe De Wilde. 2011. Digital Ecosystems: Ecosystem-Oriented Architectures. Natural Computing 10(3), 1143--1194 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nazli Cila, Iskander Smit, Elisa Giaccardi and Bend Krose. 2017. Products as Agents: Metaphors for Designing the Products of the IoT Age. In proceedings of the Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI'17), 422--459. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Torkil Clemmensen, Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie Nardi. 2016. Making HCI theory work: an analysis of the use of activity theory in HCI research. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(8), 608--627 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ritske Dankert. 2011. Using Actor-Network Theory (ANT) doing research. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://ritskedankert.nl/using-actor-networktheory-ant-doing-research/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Carl Di Salvo and Jonathan Lukens. 2011. Nonanthropocentrism and the non-human in design: Possibilities for designing new forms of engagement with and through technology. In From social butterfly to engaged citizen. MIT Press, 421--437Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitbit. Find your fit. 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from www.fitbit.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jodi Forlizzi. 2007. The Product Ecology: Understanding Social Product Use and Supporting Design Culture. International Journal of Design 2(1), 11--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Joep Frens, and Kees Overbeeke. 2009. Setting the stage for the design of highly interactive systems. In proceedings of International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR'09), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Joep Frens. 2017. Designing for Embodied and Rich Interaction in Home IoT. In proceedings of the Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement DeSForM'17Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Paul Gardien, Eva Deckers and Geert Christiaansen. 2014. Innovating Innovation: Deliver Meaningful Experiences in Ecosystems. In proceedings of the Academic Design Management Conference (DMI'14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Elisa Giaccardi, Chris Speed, Nazli Cila, Melissa L. Caldwell. 2016. Things as co-ethnographers: Implications of a thing perspective for design and anthropology. In Design Anthropological Futures, Rachel C. Smith, Kasper T. Vaskilde, Mette G. Kjaersgaard, Ton Otto, Joachim Halse, Thomas Binder (eds.). Bloomsbury Academic, 235--248Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. James J. Gibson. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, R. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds.), ErlbaumGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Google LLC. 2017. Google Home. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://store.google.com/category/home_entertainmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. IFTTT Inc. 2017. IFTTT helps your apps and devices work together in new ways. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://ifttt.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tom Jenkins, Christopher A. Le Dantex, Carl DiSalvo, Thomas Ladato and Mariam Asad. 2016. ObjectOriented Publics. In proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 827- Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Heekyoung Jung, Erik Stolterman, Will Ryan, Tonya Thompson and Marty Siegel. 2008. Toward a Framework for Ecologies of Artifacts: How are Digital Artifacts Interconnected within a Personal Life? In proceedings of Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction NordiCHI'08, 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jorn Georg Sannes Knutsen. 2014. Uprooting products of the networked city. International Journal of Design 8(1), 127--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Janne van Kollenburg, Eva Deckers, Paul Gardien and Caroline Hummels. 2015. People Research for Ecosystem propositions: a theoretical framework towards the future of interaction design. In proceedings of the Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (DeSForM'17), 102--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Janne van Kollenburg, Sander Bogers, Heleen Rutjes, Eva Deckers, Joep Frens, Caroline Hummels 2018. Exploring the Value of Parent-Tracked Baby Data in Interactions with Healthcare Professionals: A DataEnabled Design Exploration. In proceedings of the Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI'18). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Treffyn Lynch Koreshoff, Toni Robertson and Tuck Wah Leong. 2013. Internet of Things: a review of literature and products. In proceedings of Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (OzCHI'13), 335--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mike Kuniavsky. 2010. Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design. Elsevier Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Bruno Latour. 2011. Networks, societies, spheres: Reflections of an actor-network theorist. International Journal of Communication 5(15), 786--810.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ian Li, Anind Dey and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A Stagebased Model of Personal Informatics Systems. In proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10), 557--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Rochelle King, Elizabeth Churchill, Caitlin Tan. 2017. Designing with Data. O'Reilly Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Lumo Bodytech Inc. 2017. Lumo Lift. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://www.lumobodytech.com/lumo-lift/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, Translation: Collin Smith. New York: Humanities Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Carl Mitcham 1994. Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Richard Mortier, Hamed Haddadi, Tristan Henderson, Derek McAuley, and Jon Crowcroft. 2014. Humandata interaction: the human face of the data-driven society. arXiv:1412.6159 {cs.CY}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Bjorn Nansen, Luke van Ryn, Frank Vetere, Toni Robertson, Margot Brereton and Paul Dourish. 2014. An internet of social things. In proceedings of Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures (OzCHI '14), 87--96 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Bonnie Nardi, Vicky O'Day. 1999. Information Technologies, Using Technology with heart. MIT Press, Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Netatmo. 2017. Personal Weather Station: Master your own climate measurements on your smartphone. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://www.netatmo.com/product/weather/weatherstati onGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Nokia. 2017. An ideal weight loss companion. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://health.nokia.com/us/en/body-plusGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Philips AVENT. 2017. uGrow- the world's first medical baby app with connected devices giving you personal advice that matters. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from http://www.philips.co.uk/c-m-mo/ugrowhealthy-baby-development-appGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Philips Design. 2017. 90 years of years of design. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from www.philips.com/designGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Philips Healthtech B.V. 2017. FlexCare Platinum Connected. Retreived December 11, 2017 from www.usa.philips.com/c-m-pe/electrictoothbrushes/flexcare-platinum/connectedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Philips Healthtech B.V. 2017. Factsheet for CES -- Philips Avent uGrow digital parenting platform. Retreived December 11, 2017 from https://www.philips.com/cdam/corporate/newscenter/global/standard/resources/he althcare/2017/ces2017/CES-2017-Philips-AventuGrow-FactSheet.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Philips Lighting B.V. 2017. Meet Hue, Personal Wireless Lighting. Retrieved December 11, 2018, from http://www.meethue.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Alfred Schütz. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Henrik Sorensen, Dimitrios Raptis, Jesper Kjeldskov and Mikael B. Skov. 2014. The 4C Framework: Principles of Interaction in Digital Ecosystems. In proceedings of International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp'14), 87--97 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jelle Stienstra, Sander Bogers and Joep Frens. 2015. Designerly Handles: Dynamic and Contextualized Enablers for Interaction Designers. In proceedings of the Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (DeSForM'15), 86--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Lucy A. Suchman.1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. 2017. mFi® Controllable Power Outlets. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://www.ubnt.com/mfi/mpower/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Vessyl. Inc. 2017.Vessyl automatically knows and tracks everything you drink. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://www.myvessyl.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Mark Weiser. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265(3), 94--104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Xiaomi. 2017. Xiaomi Mi band 2 Black. Retrieved December 11, 2017 from https://xiaomi-mi.com/miband/xiaomi-mi-band-2-black/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    June 2018
    1418 pages
    ISBN:9781450351980
    DOI:10.1145/3196709

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 June 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    DIS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '24
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 1 - 5, 2024
    IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader