Skim-reading Strategies in Sighted and Visually-Impaired Individuals: A Comparative Study

ABSTRACT

As the amount of readily available reading material increases, the ability to read selectively, or to skim-read, is becoming an important skill. In this paper, we report a comparative study of existing skim-reading strategies in sighted and visually impaired individuals. Using a think-aloud approach, we identified key features of visual documents that allow sighted users to adopt a highly flexible and goal-oriented approach to skim-reading. These features are mostly lost when documents are accessed in auditory form, as is commonly the case for visually impaired individuals. As a result, this group has to fall back on either less efficient or cognitively more demanding exploration strategies. From our results, we propose a list of six design implications to guide the development of future technologies assisting non-visual skimming.

References

1. Faisal Ahmed, Yevgen Borodin, Yury Puzis, and IV Ramakrishnan. 2012. Why read if you can skim: towards enabling faster screen reading. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. ACM, 39.
2. Faisal Ahmed, Yevgen Borodin, Andrii Soviak, Muhammad Islam, IV Ramakrishnan, and Terri Hedgpeth. 2012. Accessible skimming: faster screen reading of web pages. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 367--378.
3. Faisal Ahmed, Andrii Soviak, Yevgen Borodin, and IV Ramakrishnan. 2013. Non-visual skimming on touch-screen devices. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 435--444.
4. Jason Alexander, Andy Cockburn, Stephen Fitchett, Carl Gutwin, and Saul Greenberg. 2009. Revisiting read wear: analysis, design, and evaluation of a footprints scrollbar. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1665--1674.
5. Jodi Aronson. 1995. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The qualitative report 2, 1 (1995), 1--3.
6. Chieko Asakawa, Hironobu Takagi, Shuichi Ino, and Tohru Ifukube. 2002. Auditory and tactile interfaces for representing the visual effects on the web. In Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies. ACM, 65--72.
7. Nicholas Carr. 2011. The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. WW Norton & Company.
8. Geoffrey B Duggan and Stephen J Payne. 2009. Text skimming: The process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15, 3 (2009), 228.
9. Geoffrey B Duggan and Stephen J Payne. 2011. Skim reading by satisficing: evidence from eye tracking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1141--1150.
10. K Anders Ericsson and Herbert A Simon. 1980. Verbal reports as data. Psychological review 87, 3 (1980), 215.
11. Howard Gardner. 2003. Multiple intelligences after twenty years. American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois 21 (2003).
12. E Bruce Goldstein and James Brockmole. 2016. Sensation and perception. Cengage Learning.
13. Charles F Greenbacker. 2012. Summarizing multimodal documents in popular media for people with visual impairments. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 102 (2012), 13--16.
14. Jukka Hyona, Robert F Lorch, and Johanna K Kaakinen. 2002. Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 1 (2002), 44--55.
15. Pourang Irani, Carl Gutwin, and Xing Dong Yang. 2006. Improving selection of off-screen targets with hopping. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. ACM, 299--308.
16. Juho Kim, Amy X Zhang, Jihee Kim, Robert C Miller, and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2014. Content-aware kinetic scrolling for supporting web page navigation. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 123--127.
17. Anatole Lécuyer, Pascal Mobuchon, Christine Mégard, Jérôme Perret, Claude Andriot, and J-P Colinot. 2003. HOMERE: a multimodal system for visually impaired people to explore virtual environments. In Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE. IEEE, 251--258.
18. Byungjoo Lee, Olli Savisaari, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2016. Spotlights: Attention-Optimized Highlights for Skim Reading. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5203--5214.
19. Ziming Liu. 2005. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of documentation 61, 6 (2005), 700--712.
20. Elena Manishina, Jean-Marc Lecarpentier, Fabrice Maurel, Stéphane Ferrari, and Maxence Busson. 2016. Tag Thunder: Towards Non-Visual Web Page Skimming. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 281--282.
21. Michael E Masson. 1982. Cognitive processes in skimming stories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8, 5 (1982), 400.
22. David McGookin, Euan Robertson, and Stephen Brewster. 2010. Clutching at straws: using tangible interaction to provide non-visual access to graphs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1715--1724.
23. Grégory Petit, Aude Dufresne, Vincent Levesque, Vincent Hayward, and Nicole Trudeau. 2008. Refreshable tactile graphics applied to schoolbook illustrations for students with visual impairment. In Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. ACM, 89--96.
24. Keith Rayner, Elizabeth R Schotter, Michael EJ Masson, Mary C Potter, and Rebecca Treiman. 2016. So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 17, 1 (2016), 4--34.
25. Ricardo Rios, Eva Garcia, Antonio Garcia-Cabot, Luis de Marcos, Salvador Oton, Roberto Barchino Gutierrez-de Mesa, and Jonathan Bar-Magen. 2012. Accesibilidad en Smartphones para el acceso a contenidos e-learning. In III Congreso Iberoamericano sobre Calidad y Accesibilidad de la Formación Virtual (CAFVIR 2012).
26. Martin Rotard, Sven Knödler, and Thomas Ertl. 2005. A tactile web browser for the visually disabled. In Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. ACM, 15--22.
27. Martin Rotard, Christiane Taras, and Thomas Ertl. 2008. Tactile web browsing for blind people. Multimedia Tools and Applications 37, 1 (2008), 53--69.
28. SH Srinivasan. 2006. Speakr: auditory skimming and scrolling. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 799--800.
29. Stanford E Taylor. 1962. An evaluation of forty-one trainees who had recently completed the âĂIJReading DynamicsâĂİ program. In Problems, programs, and projects in college adult reading. Eleventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference. ERIC, 51--120.
30. Stanford E Taylor. 1965. Eye movements in reading: Facts and fallacies. American Educational Research Journal 2, 4 (1965), 187--202.
31. Christopher D Wickens. 1991. Processing resources and attention. Multiple-task performance 1991 (1991), 3--34.
32. Christopher D Wickens, Sallie E Gordon, Yili Liu, and John Lee. 1998. An introduction to human factors engineering. (1998).
33. Susan C Wilkinson, Will Reader, and Stephen J Payne. 2012. Adaptive browsing: Sensitivity to time pressure and task difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70, 1 (2012), 14--25.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Accessibility

    • Empirical studies in accessibility