skip to main content
10.1145/3197768.3201546acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sign Language technologies in view of Future Internet accessibility services

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we touch upon the requirement for accessibility via Sign Language as regards dynamic composition and exchange of new content in the context of natural language based human interaction, and also accessibility of web services and electronic content in written text by deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. In this framework, one key issue remains the option for composition of signed "text", along with the ability for reuse of pre-existing signed "text" by exploiting basic editing facilities similar to those available for written text serving vocal language representation. An equally critical related issue is accessibility of vocal language text by born or early deaf signers, as well as the use of web based facilities via sign language supported interfaces, taking into account that the majority of native signers present limited reading skills. It is, thus, demonstrated how sign language technologies and resources may be integrated in human-centered applications enabling web services and content accessibility in the education and everyday communication context, in order to facilitate integration of signer populations in a societal environment that is strongly defined by smart life style conditions. This potential is also demonstrated by end user-evaluation results.

References

  1. Chamberlain, Ch., Morford, J., Mayberry, R. 1999. Language Acquisition By Eye. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Leigh, I. & Andrews, J. 2017. Deaf People and Society: Psychological, Sociological and Educational Perspectives. Routledge, New York. (2017, 2nd edition).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ghari, Z. 2016. The Cognitive, Psychological and Cultural Impact of Communication Barrier on Deaf Adults' Content of Speech in Iran. Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids 4:164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dicta-Sign project. 2012. Deliverable D8.1: Project demonstrator: Sign-Wiki, February, 2012: http://www.dictasign.eu/attach/Main/PubliclyAvailableProjectDeliverables/DICTA-SIGN_Deliverable_D8.1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Efthimiou, E., S.-E. Fotinea, T. Hanke, J. Glauert, R. Bowden, A. Braffort, C. Collet, P. Maragos and F. Lefebvre-Albaret. 2012. The Dicta-Sign Wiki: Enabling Web Communication for the Deaf, In: K. Miesenberger, A. Karshmer, P. Penaz, W. Zagler), Springer (ISBN: 978-3-642-31533-6 (Print) 978-3-642-31534-3 (Online)), Vol. 7383, 2012, pp. 205--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Efthimiou, E., Fotinea, S. E., Hanke, T., Glauert, J., Bowden, R., Braffort, A., Collet, C., Maragos P. and Lefebvre-Albaret, F. 2012. Sign Language technologies and resources of the Dicta-Sign project. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions between Corpus and Lexicon (LREC-2012), pp 37--45. Istanbul, Turkey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott, R., Glauert, J. R. W., Jennings, V. and Kennaway, J. R. 2004. An Overview of the SiGML Notation and SiGML Signing Software System. In: Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Representing and Processing of Sign Languages. (LREC-2004), pp. 98--104. Lisbon, Portugal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Schnepp, J., Wolfe, R., McDonald, J. 2010. Synthetic Corpora: A Synergy of Linguistics and Computer Animation. In: Proceedings of 4th Workshop on Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpora and Sign Language Technologies, (LREC-2010), pp. 217--220. Valletta, Malta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. McDonald, J., Wolfe, R., Wilbur, R.B., Moncrief, R., Malaia, E., Fujimoto, S., Baowidan, S., Stec, J. 2016. A New Tool to Facilitate Prosodic Analysis of Motion Capture Data and a Datadriven Technique for the Improvement of Avatar Motion. In Proceedings of 7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining (LREC-2016). pp. 153--158. Portorož, Slovenia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Efthimiou, E., Fotinea, S.-E., Goulas, T., Kakoulidis, P. 2015. User Friendly Interfaces for Sign Retrieval and Sign Synthesis. In M. Antona and C. Stephanidis (Eds.): UAHCI 2015, Part II, LNCS 9176, pp. 1--11, Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stokoe, W.C. Sign language structure. (2nd edition), Silver Spring MD, Linstock Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Zienert, H., Hanke, T. and Henning, J. 1989. HamNoSys. Version 2.0. Hamburg Notation System for Sign Language: An Introductory Guide, Signum, Hamburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanke, T. 2004. HamNoSys - representing sign language data in language resources and language processing contexts. In: Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Representing and Processing of Sign Languages (LREC-2004), pp. 1--6. Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Neidle, C. 2002. SignStream™: A Database Tool for Research on Visual-Gestural Language. In: Brita Bergman, Penny Boyes-Braem, Thomas Hanke, Elena Pizzuto (eds.), Sign Transcription and Database Storage of Sign Information, special issue of Sign Language and Linguistics 4/1, 203--214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pizzuto, E. and Pietrandrea, P. 2001. The notation of signed texts: Open questions and indications for further research. In: Sign Language and Linguistics 4 (1/2), 29--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. McDonald, J., Wolfe, R., Wilbur, R.B., Moncrief, R., Malaia, E., Fujimoto, S., Baowidan, S., Stec, J. 2016. A New Tool to Facilitate Prosodic Analysis of Motion Capture Data and a Datadriven Technique for the Improvement of Avatar Motion. In Proceedings of 7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining (LREC-2016). pp. 153--158. Portorož, Slovenia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Huenerfauth, M. 2008. Evaluation of a psycholinguistically motivated timing model for animations of american sign language. In: 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS08), pp. 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Adamo-Villani N. and Wilbur R. B. 2015. ASL-Pro: American Sign Language Animation with Prosodic Elements. In M. Antona and C. Stephanidis (Eds.): UAHCI 2015, Part II, LNCS 9176, pp. 307--318, Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Huenerfauth, M. 2009 A linguistically motivated model for speed and pausing in animations of american sign language. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 2(2), 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wolfe, R., Cook, P., McDonald, J.C., Schnepp, J. 2011. Linguistics as structure in computer animation: toward a more effective synthesis of brow motion in American sign language. Sign Language Linguistics 14(1), 179--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Efthimiou, E., Fotinea, S-E., Kakoulidis, P., Goulas, T., Dimou, A-L., Vacalopoulou, A. 2017. Sign Search and Sign Synthesis Made Easy to End User: The Paradigm of Building a SL Oriented Interface for Accessing and Managing Educational Content. In M. Antona and C. Stephanidis (Eds.): Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Designing Novel Interactions (UAHCI 2017), Part II, LNCS 10278, pp. 1--13, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Prokopidis, P., Georgandopoulos, B., Papageorgiou, Ch. 2011. A suite of NLP tools for Greek. In The 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics. Komotini, Greece.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Efthimiou, E.,. Fotinea, S.-E., Goulas, T., Kakoulidis, P., Dimou, A.-L., Vacalopoulou. A. 2016. A Complete Environment for Deaf Learner Support in the Context of Mainstream Education. In Proceedings of the Conference Universal Learning Design, vol. 5. ISSN 1805-3947 Linz, 13-15 July, pp. 35--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Efthimiou, E., Fotinea, S.-E., Dimou, A.-L., Goulas, T., Karioris, P., Vasilaki, K., Vacalopoulou, A., Pissaris, M., Korakakis. D. 2016. From a sign lexical database to an SL golden corpus -- the POLYTROPON SL resource. In Proceedings of 7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining (LREC-2016). pp. 63--68. Portorož, Slovenia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Fotinea, S-E. & Efthimiou, E. 2008. Tools for Deaf accessibility to an eGOV environment. In: K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler, A. Karshmer (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 446--453. Springer, Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ebling, S., Wolfe, R., Schnepp, J., Baowidan, S., McDonald, J., Moncrief, R., Sidler-Miserez, S., Tissi, T. 2015. Synthesizing the finger alphabet of Swiss German Sign Language and evaluating the comprehensibility of the resulting animations. In 6th Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies (SLPAT), p. 10--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wolfe, R., McDonald, J., Toro, J., Baowidan, S., Moncrief, R. and Schnepp, J. 2015. Promoting Better Deaf/Hearing Communication Through an Improved Interaction Design for Fingerspelling Practice. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Today's Technologies, pp. 495--505. Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Glauert, J. & Elliott., R. 2011. Extending the SiGML Notation - a Progress Report. In Second International Workshop on Sign Language Translation and Avatar Technology (SLTAT-2011), Dundee, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Efthimiou, E., Fotinea, S.-E., Goulas, T., Dimou, A.-L., Kouremenos., D. 2016. From Grammar Based MT to Post-processed SL Representations. In R. Wolfe, E. Efthimiou, J. Glauert, T. Hanke, J. McDonald, J. Schnepp (eds) Special issue: recent advances in sign language translation and avatar technology, Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS) 15, pp. 499--511. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sign Language technologies in view of Future Internet accessibility services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PETRA '18: Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference
      June 2018
      591 pages
      ISBN:9781450363907
      DOI:10.1145/3197768

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader