skip to main content
10.1145/3204493.3204534acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enabling unsupervised eye tracker calibration by school children through games

Published:14 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

To use eye trackers in a school classroom, children need to be able to calibrate their own tracker unsupervised and on repeated occasions. A game designed specifically around the need to maintain their gaze in fixed locations was used to collect calibration and verification data. The data quality obtained was compared with a standard calibration procedure and another game, in two studies carried out in three elementary schools. One studied the effect on data quality over repeated occasions and the other studied the effect of age on data quality. The first showed that accuracy obtained from unsupervised calibration by children was twice as good after six occasions with the game requiring the fixed gaze location compared with the standard calibration, and as good as standard calibration by group of supervised adults. In the second study, age was found to have no effect on performance in the groups of children studied.

References

  1. Deepak Akkil, Poika Isokoski, Jari Kangas, Jussi Rantala, and Roope Raisamo. 2014. TraQuMe: A Tool for Measuring the Gaze Tracking Quality. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 327--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Robin Brewer, Lisa Anthony, Quincy Brown, Germaine Irwin, Jaye Nias, and Berthel Tate. 2013. Using gamification to motivate children to complete empirical studies in lab environments. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 388--391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paul Denny. 2013. The Effect of Virtual Achievements on Student Engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 763--772. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Anna Maria Feit, Shane Williams, Arturo Toledo, Ann Paradiso, Harish Kulkarni, Shaun Kane, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2017. Toward Everyday Gaze Input: Accuracy and Precision of Eye Tracking and Implications for Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1118--1130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. David R. Flatla, Carl Gutwin, Lennart E. Nacke, Scott Bateman, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2011. Calibration Games: Making Calibration Tasks Enjoyable by Adding Motivating Game Elements. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 403--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Juho Hamari and Veikko Eranti. 2011. Framework for Designing and Evaluating Game Achievements.. In Digra Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kenneth Holmqvist, Marcus Nyström, and Fiona Mulvey. 2012. Eye Tracker Data Quality: What It is and How to Measure It. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Anthony J. Hornof and Tim Halverson. 2002. Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 4 (01 Nov 2002), 592--604.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Diederick C. Niehorster, Tim H. W. Cornelissen, Kenneth Holmqvist, Ignace T. C. Hooge, and Roy S. Hessels. 2017. What to expect from your remote eye-tracker when participants are unrestrained. Behavior Research Methods (15 Feb 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ken Pfeuffer, Melodie Vidal, Jayson Turner, Andreas Bulling, and Hans Gellersen. 2013. Pursuit Calibration: Making Gaze Calibration Less Tedious and More Flexible. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Janet C Read, SJ MacFarlane, and Chris Casey. 2002. Endurability, engagement and expectations: Measuring children's fun. In Interaction design and children, Vol. 2. Shaker Publishing Eindhoven, 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eyal M. Reingold. 2014. Eye tracking research and technology: Towards objective measurement of data quality. Visual Cognition 22, 3--4 (2014), 635--652. PMID: 24771998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Scott Rogers. 2014. Level Up! The Guide to Great Video Game Design (2nd ed.). Wiley. Oleg Špakov. 2012. Comparison of Eye Movement Filters Used in HCI. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 281--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Oleg Špakov, Harri Siirtola, Howell Istance, and Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2017. Visualizing the Reading Activity of People Learning to Read. Journal of Eye Movement Research 10, 5 (2017). https://bop.unibe.ch/index.php/JEMR/article/view/3735Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Enabling unsupervised eye tracker calibration by school children through games

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ETRA '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications
        June 2018
        595 pages
        ISBN:9781450357067
        DOI:10.1145/3204493

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

        Upcoming Conference

        ETRA '24
        The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
        June 4 - 7, 2024
        Glasgow , United Kingdom

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader