ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a framework for solving high-dimensional robust multi-objective optimization problems. A decision variable classification-based framework is developed to search for robust Pareto-optimal solutions. The decision variables are classified as highly and weakly robustness-related variables based on their contributions to the robustness of candidate solutions. In the case study, an order scheduling problem in the apparel industry is investigated via the proposed framework. The experimental results reveal that the performance of robust evolutionary optimization can be greatly improved via analyzing the properties of decision variables and then decomposing the high-dimensional robust multi-objective optimization problem.
- Ram Bhusan Agrawal, Kalyanmoy Deb, and Ram Bhushan Agrawal. 1995. Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex systems 9, 2 (1995), 115--148.Google Scholar
- Md Asafuddoula, Hemant K Singh, and Tapabrata Ray. 2015. Six-sigma robust design optimization using a many-objective decomposition-based evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 19, 4 (2015), 490--507.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard E Bellman. 2015. Adaptive control processes: a guided tour. Princeton university press.Google Scholar
- Kalyanmoy Deb and Mayank Goyal. 1996. A combined genetic adaptive search (GeneAS) for engineering design. Computer Science and informatics 26 (1996), 30--45.Google Scholar
- Kalyanmoy Deb and Himanshu Gupta. 2006. Introducing robustness in multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation 14, 4 (2006), 463--494. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wei Du, Sunney Yung Sun Leung, Yang Tang, and Athanasius V Vasilakos. 2017. Differential Evolution With Event-Triggered Impulsive Control. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 47, 1 (2017), 244--257.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wei Du, Yang Tang, Sunney Yung Sun Leung, Le Tong, Athanasius V Vasilakos, and Feng Qian. 2018. Robust Order Scheduling in the Discrete Manufacturing Industry: A Multiobjective Optimization Approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 14, 1 (2018), 253--264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan E Fieldsend and Richard M Everson. 2015. The rolling tide evolutionary algorithm: A multiobjective optimizer for noisy optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 19, 1 (2015), 103--117.Google ScholarDigital Library
- António Gaspar-Cunha and José A Covas. 2008. Robustness in multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Computational Optimization and Applications 39, 1 (2008), 75--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chi-Keong Goh and Kay Chen Tan. 2009. Robust Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization. In Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization in Uncertain Environments. Springer, 189--211.Google Scholar
- Shouyong Jiang and Shengxiang Yang. 2017. A steady-state and generational evolutionary algorithm for dynamic multiobjective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 21, 1 (2017), 65--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yaochu Jin. 2005. A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation. Soft Computing 9, 1 (2005), 3--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yaochu Jin and Jürgen Branke. 2005. Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments-a survey. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 9, 3 (2005), 303--317. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiaoliang Ma, Fang Liu, Yutao Qi, Xiaodong Wang, Lingling Li, Licheng Jiao, Minglei Yin, and Maoguo Gong. 2016. A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decision variable analyses for multiobjective optimization problems with large-scale variables. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 20, 2 (2016), 275--298.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohammad Nabi Omidvar, Xiaodong Li, Yi Mei, and Xin Yao. 2014. Cooperative co-evolution with differential grouping for large scale optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 18, 3 (2014), 378--393.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yew-Soon Ong, Prasanth B Nair, and Kai Yew Lum. 2006. Max-min surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithm for robust design. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 10, 4 (2006), 392--404. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ingo Paenke, Jürgen Branke, and Yaochu Jin. 2006. Efficient search for robust solutions by means of evolutionary algorithms and fitness approximation. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 10, 4 (2006), 405--420. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mitchell A Potter and Kenneth A De Jong. 1994. A cooperative coevolutionary approach to function optimization. In International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Springer, 249--257. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rainer Storn and Kenneth Price. 1997. Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of global optimization 11, 4 (1997), 341--359. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David A Van Veldhuizen and Gary B Lamont. 2000. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evolutionary Computation 8, 2 (2000), 125--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Handing Wang, Qingfu Zhang, Licheng Jiao, and Xin Yao. 2016. Regularity model for noisy multiobjective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 46, 9 (2016), 1997--2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhenyu Yang, Ke Tang, and Xin Yao. 2008. Large scale evolutionary optimization using cooperative coevolution. Information Sciences 178, 15 (2008), 2985--2999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xingyi Zhang, Ye Tian, Ran Cheng, and Yaochu Jin. to be published, 2017. A decision variable clustering-based evolutionary algorithm for large-scale many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation (to be published, 2017).Google Scholar
- Aimin Zhou, Bo-Yang Qu, Hui Li, Shi-Zheng Zhao, Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan, and Qingfu Zhang. 2011. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 1, 1 (2011), 32--49.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Approximate non-dominated sorting for evolutionary many-objective optimization
Non-dominated sorting has widely been adopted and shown to be very effective in dominance based evolutionary multi-objective optimization where the number of objectives is two or three. In dealing with many-objective optimization problems, where the ...
Single-objective and multi-objective formulations of solution selection for hypervolume maximization
GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computationA new trend in evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) is the handling of a multi-objective problem as an optimization problem of an indicator function. A number of approaches have been proposed under the name of indicator-based evolutionary ...
A robust evolutionary framework for multi-objective optimization
GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computationEvolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) methodologies, suggested in the beginning of Nineties, focussed on the task of finding a set of well-converged and well-distributed set of solutions using evolutionary optimization principles. Of the EMO ...
Comments