skip to main content
10.1145/3267305.3274143acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

UbiTtention 2018: 3rd International Workshop on Smart & Ambient Notification and Attention Management

Published:08 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the advancing ubiquitous computing, users are increasingly confronted with a tremendous amount of information proactively provided via notifications from versatile applications and services, through multiple devices and screens in their environment. The human's attention is becoming a new significant bottleneck. Further, the latest computing trends with emerging new devices including versatile IoT devices, and contexts, such as smart cities and vehicles, are even accelerating this situation. In such situations, "attention management", including attention representation, sensing, prediction, analysis, and adaptive behavior in the computer systems, are needed in our computing system. Following last years' successful UbiTtention 2016 and UbiTtention 2017 workshops with up to 50 participants, the UbiTtention 2018 workshop brings together researchers and practitioners from academy and industry to explore the management of human attention and notifications with versatile devices and smart situations to overcome information overload and overchoice.

References

  1. Matthias Böhmer, Christian Lander, Sven Gehring, Duncan P. Brumby, and Antonio Krüger. 2014. Interrupted by a Phone Call: Exploring Designs for Lowering the Impact of Call Notifications for Smartphone Users. In CHI '14. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jelmer P. Borst, Niels A. Taatgen, and Hedderik van Rijn. 2015. What Makes Interruptions Disruptive?: A Process-Model Account of the Effects of the Problem State Bottleneck on Task Interruption and Resumption. In CHI '15. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Karen Church and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2013. What's Up with WhatsApp?: Comparing Mobile Instant Messaging Behaviors with Traditional SMS. In MobileHCI '13. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A Diary Study of Task Switching and Interruptions. In CHI '04. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2010. Notifications and Awareness: A Field Study of Alert Usage and Preferences. In CSCW'10. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yasumasa Kobayashi, Takahiro Tanaka, Kazuaki Aoki, and Kinya Fujita. 2015. Automatic Delivery Timing Control of Incoming Email Based on User Interruptibility. In CHI EA '15. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gloria Mark, Stephen Voida, and Armand Cardello. 2012. "A Pace Not Dictated by Electrons": An Empirical Study of Work Without Email. In CHI '12. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tadashi Okoshi, Julian Ramos, Hiroki Nozaki, Jin Nakazawa, Anind K. Dey, and Hideyuki Tokuda. 2015. Reducing Users' Perceived Mental Effort Due to Interruptive Notifications in Multi-device Mobile Environments. In UbiComp '15. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tadashi Okoshi, Kota Tsubouchi, Masaya Taji, Takanori Ichikawa, and Hideyuki Tokuda. 2017. Attention and Engagement-Awareness in the Wild: A Large-Scale Study with Adaptive Notifications. In PerCom '17. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Veljko Pejovic and Mirco Musolesi. 2014. InterruptMe: Designing Intelligent Prompting Mechanisms for Pervasive Applications. In UbiComp '14. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Martin Pielot, Karen Church, and Rodrigo de Oliveira. 2014. An In-situ Study of Mobile Phone Notifications. In MobileHCI '14. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Martin Pielot and Luz Rello. 2015. The Do Not Disturb Challenge: A Day Without Notifications. In CHI EA '15. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Benjamin Poppinga, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. Sensor-Based Identification of Opportune Moments for Triggering Notifications. IEEE Pervasive Computing (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Niels Henze, Tilman Dingler, Martin Pielot, Dominik Weber, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Large-scale Assessment of Mobile Notifications. In CHI '14. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cary Stothart, Ainsley Mitchum, and Courtney Yehnert. 2015. The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dominik Weber, Alexandra Voit, Jonas Auda, Stefan Schneegass, and Niels Henze. 2018. Snooze! Investigating the User-defined Deferral of Mobile Notifications. In MobileHCI '18. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dominik Weber, Alexandra Voit, Philipp Kratzer, and Niels Henze. 2016. In-situ Investigation of Notifications in Multi-device Environments. In Ubicomp '16. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. UbiTtention 2018: 3rd International Workshop on Smart & Ambient Notification and Attention Management

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers
      October 2018
      1881 pages
      ISBN:9781450359665
      DOI:10.1145/3267305

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 October 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader