skip to main content
10.1145/3290607.3312961acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

MirrorMe: Increasing Prosocial Behaviour in Public Transport

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Public transport can be a place where commuters feel rushed or stressed. Missing your train, a delayed bus or crowdedness at the station does not induce happiness among most people. As a consequence, prosocial behaviour like offering someone a seat is displayed less often. We discuss the design and design process of MirrorMe, a simple communal game to induce positive mood of commuters. MirrorMe aims to increase prosocial behaviour through mimicry. Commuters are challenged to "make a face" and thereby connect to other commuters. MirrorMe will be installed in a public display close to a train station enabling access to all commuters and passers-by. This work addresses the need for games and play in public setting to stimulate prosocial behaviour. It exemplifies how multidisciplinary HCI approaches in a gamejam setting can contribute to real life challenges. We conclude with open questions for impact evaluation in future work.

References

  1. Rick BVAN Baaren and Roos Vonk. 2008. Effects of mimicking?: Acting prosocially by being emotionally moved. 976, October 2007: 965--976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Rick Bvan Baaren, Rob W Holland, Kerry Kawakami, and Ad van Knippenberg. 2004. Research Report Mimicry and Prosocial Behavior. Psychological Science (Wiley-Blackwell) 15, 1: 71--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Regina Bernhaupt, Andreas Boldt, Thomas Mirlacher, David Wilfinger, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2007. Using emotion in games. Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology ACE '07: 41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jason T. Bowey, Max V. Birk, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2015. Manipulating Leaderboards to Induce Player Experience. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY '15: 115--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ida Damen, Rens Brankaert, Carl Megens, Pieter van Wesemael, Aarnout Brombacher, and Steven Vos. 2018. Let's Walk and Talk: A Design Case to Integrate an Active Lifestyle into Daily Office Life. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18 2012: 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J.P. Gee. 2003. What Video Games Have To Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Luke Hespanhol, Martin Tomitsch, Oliver Bown, and Miriama Young. 2014. Using embodied audio-visual interaction to promote social encounters around large media façades. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS '14: 945--954. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jun Hu, Mathias Funk, Yu Zhang, et al. 2016. Designing Interactive Public Art Installations?: New Material Therefore New Challenges To cite this version?: HAL Id?: hal-01408522 Designing Interactive Public Art Installations?: .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sunmin Lee, (Wynnie) Wing Yi Chung, Emily Ip, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2014. The Laughing Dress: Evoking Prosocial Interaction Among Strangers. 2143--2148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Debra Mashek, Lisa W. Cannaday, and June P. Tangney. 2007. INCLUSION OF COMMUNITY IN SELF SCALE: A SINGLE-ITEM PICTORIAL MEASURE OF COMMUNITY CONNECTEDNESS. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 35, 2: 257--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Mckenna, J. W., Flower. 2014. Get them back on track: Use of the good behavior game to improve student behavior. Beyond Behavior 23, 2: 20--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. Peng, W., Lee, M., Heeter. 2010. The Effects of a Serious Game on Role-Taking and Willing- ness to Help. Journal of Communication 60, 4: 723--742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D Ruggiero. 2015. The effect of a persuasive so- cial impact game on affective learning and attitude. Computers in Human Behavior 45, 2015: 213--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Shalom Schwartz and Wolfgang Bilsky. 1989. Toward a Theory of the Universal Content and Structure of Values: Extensions and Cross-Cultural Replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 550--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. H. Smith, E., Mackie, D., Claypool. 2015. Social Psychology. In Psychology Press, New York, 230--273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharon Steinemann, Benjamin Geelan, Kristy de Salas, and Klaus Opwis. 2017. Simple Acts for a Better World: A Gameful System for Prosocial Behavior: Preliminary Design and Research Plan. Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play: 305--313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Sharon T. Steinemann, Klaus Opwis, and Elisa D. Mekler. 2016. The winner gives it all? Preliminary results on the role of game outcome on the effectiveness of a game for change. 291--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Stel. 2005. The Social Functions of Mimicry?: On the Consequences and Qualifiers of Facial Imitation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mariëlle Stel, Eric Van Dijk, and Rick B Van Baaren. 2016. When and Why Mimicry is Facilitated and Attenuated. 10: 561--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Nils Torge Telle and Hans Rüdiger Pfister. 2015. Positive empathy and prosocial behavior: A neglected link. Emotion Review 8, 2: 154--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Martin Tomitsch and M. Hank Haeusler. 2015. Infostructures: Towards a Complementary Approach for Solving Urban Challenges through Digital Technologies. Journal of Urban Technology 22, 3: 37--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Affectiva Software. Retrieved July 14, 2018 from www.affectiva.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. MirrorMe: Increasing Prosocial Behaviour in Public Transport

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '19: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      3673 pages
      ISBN:9781450359719
      DOI:10.1145/3290607

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format