skip to main content
article
Free Access

Dynamic verification of operating system decisions

Published:01 November 1973Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Dynamic verification of a decision implies that every time the decision is made there is a consistency check performed on the decision using independent hardware and software. The dynamic verification of operating system decisions is used on the PRIME system being designed and constructed at the University of California, Berkeley. PRIME is an experimental time-sharing system which is to have the properties of continuous availability, data privacy, and cost effectiveness. The technique of dynamic verification allows the construction of an operating system which does not make certain decisions improperly even in the presence of a single hardware or software fault. Furthermore, multiple faults lead to unreliable operation only if the faults happen to reinforce each other. On PRIME, dynamic verification is used to ensure that one user's information cannot become available to another user gratuitously even in the presence of a single hardware or software fault. The amount of additional hardware and software required for dynamic verification can be modest.

References

  1. 1 Baskin, H. B., Borgerson, B. R., and Roberts, R. PRIME- a modular architecture for terminal-oriented systems. Proc. AFIPS 1972 SJCC, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 431-437.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Borgerson, B. R. A fail-softly system for time-sharing use. Digest of the 1972 lnternat. Symp. on Fault Tolerant Computing, June 1972, pp. 89-93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Quatse, J. T., Gaulene, P., and Dodge, D. The external access network of a modular computer system. Proc. AFIPS 1972 SJCC, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 783-790.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Borgerson, B. R. Spontaneous reconfiguration in a faiLsoftly computer utility. Proc. Datafair 73, British Computer Society, London, pp. 326-333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Lampson, B. W. Protection. Proc. 5th Princeton Conf. on lnformat. Sciences and Systems, 1971, pp. 437-443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Amdahl, G. M. The structure of SYSTEM/360, Part 3- Processing unit design considerations. IBM Systems J. 3, 2 & 3 (196Zl), 144-164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Weissman, C. Security controls in the ADEPT-50 timesharing system. Proc. AFIPS 1969 FJCC, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., pp. 119-133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Carter, W. C., and Bouricius, W.G. A survey of fault tolerant computer architecture and its evaluation. Computer (Jan. 1971), 10-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Dijkstra, E. W. The structure of THE multiprogramming system. Comm. ACM 11, 5 (May 1968), 341-346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Elspas, B., et al. An assessment of techniques for proving program correctness. Computing Surveys 4, 2 (June 1972), 97-147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image Communications of the ACM
    Communications of the ACM  Volume 16, Issue 11
    Nov. 1973
    135 pages
    ISSN:0001-0782
    EISSN:1557-7317
    DOI:10.1145/355611
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 1973 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 November 1973

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader