skip to main content
article
Free Access

An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction

Published:01 March 1986Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

"User involvement" in information system development is generally considered an important mechanism for improving system quality and ensuring successful system implementation. The common assumption that user involvement leads to system usage and/or information satisfaction is examined in a survey of 200 production managers. Alternative models exploring the causal ordering of the three variables are developed and tested via path analysis. The results demonstrate that user involvement in the development of information systems will enhance both system usage and the user's satisfaction with the system. Further, the study provides evidence that the user's satisfaction with the system will lead to greater system usage.

References

  1. 1 Alter. S., Development patterns for decision support systems. MIS Q. 2, 3 (Sept. 1978). 33-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 Bailey, I.E. and Pearson, S.W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manage. Sci. 29, 6 (May 1983), 519-529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Barrett, G.V., Thornton, C.L., and Cahe, P.A. Human factors evaluation of computer-based information storage and retrieval systems. Hum. Factors 10, (1966), 431-436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4 Billings, R., and Wroten, S. Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: Criticisms and suggestions. I. Appl. Psycho/. 63. 6 (1978), 677-688.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Bostrom. R.P., and Heinen, J.S. MIS problems and failures: A sociotechnical perspective. MIS (2. I, 3, Part I. (Sept. 1977), 17-32; MIS Q. 1, 4, Part II, (Dec. 1977), 11-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Davis. G.B. Managemenf Information Sysfems: Concepkial Foundarions, Sfructure, and DeuelopmenL McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 Edstrom. A. User inlluence and the success of MIS projects. Hum. Relat. 30. (1977), 589-606.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Fishhein, M., anti Ajzen. I. Belief Atfifude, Infention and Behavior; An Introducfion to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Franz, C.R. Organizational factors affecting user involvement in information systems design. Unpublished Working Paper, Univ. of Sooth Carolina, Colombia, Nov. 1!379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Gallagher, CA. Perceptions of the value of a management information system. Acad. Manage. J 17, 1, (19741, 46-55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Ginzberg. M.J. Participative systems design. In Design and Zmplementarion of Comparer Based Information Systems. N. Szyperski and E. Grochla, Eds. Sijthoff and Nordhoff, Germantown, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Guthrie. A. A Survey of Canadian Middle Managers' Attitudes Toward Management Informafiorr Systems. Carleton Univ., Ottawa, Ontario, Dec. 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Heise, D.R. Problems in path analysis and causal inference. In Sociological Methodology, B.F. Borgatta, Ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 Igersheim, R.H. Management response to an information system. In AFlPS Conference Proceedings, National Computer Conference, 1976, pp. 877-882.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 Ives, B., and Olson, M. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Manage. Sci. 30, 5 (May 19841, 586-603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16 Ives, B., Olson, M., and Baroudi. J. Measuring user information satisfaction: A method and critique. Commun. ACM 26, 10 (Oct. 19831, 785-793. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17 Kaiser. K.M., and Srinivasan, A. The relationship of user attitudes toward design criteria and information systems success. In Proceedings of fhe National AIDS Conference, (Nov. 1980), pp. 201-203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 Kenny, D.A. Correlafion and Causality. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 King, W.R. and Rodriguez, J.I. Evaluating MIS. MIS Q. 2, 3 (Sept. 1978). 43-52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 King, W.R., and Rodriguez, J.I. Participative design of strategic decision support systems: An empirical assessment. Manage. Sci. 27, 6 (June 1981). 717-726.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21 Kling, R. The organizational contwt of user-centered software design. MIS Q. I, 4 (Dec. 1977). 41-5;!.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22 Locke, E.A., and Schweiger. D. Participation in decision making: One more look. In Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. I, B. Staw, Ed. JAI Press, Greenwich, Corm. 1979. pp. 265-339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 Lonnstedt. L. Factors related to the implementation of operations research solutions. Interfaces 5, 2 (1975), 23-30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24 Lucas. H.C., Jr. Toward Creative Systems Design. Columbia University Press, New York, 1974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25 Lucas, H.C., Jr. Wily Information Systems Fail. Colombia University Press, New York, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26 Lucas, H.C., Jr. The Implemenfation of Computer-Based Models. National Association of Accountants. New York, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27 Lucas, H.C. Jr. The use of an interactive information storage and retrieval system in medical research. Commun. ACM 21, 3 (1978), 197-205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28 Maish, A.M. A user's behavior toward his MIS. MIS Q. 3, 1 (Mar. 1979). 39-52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29 Mumford, E. and Sackman. H. International human choice and computers: Conference retrospect and prospect. In Human Choice and Compufers. E. Mumford and H. Sackman. Eds., North-Holland. Amsterdam, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 Pearson, S. Measurement of computer user satisfaction. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University. Tempe, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31 Powers, R.F., and Dickson, G.W. MIS project management: Myths, opinions, and reality. Califortiia Manage. Rev. 15, 3 (Spring 1973). 147-156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. 32 Rohey. D. and Farrow, D. Information system development: Some dynamics of user involvement. In Proceedings of the National AIDS Conference. (Nov. 1979). pp. 149-151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33 Sartore, A. Implementing a management information system: The relationship of participation, knowledge, performance, and satisfaction in an academic environment. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Irvine, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34 Schewe. C.D. The MIS user: An exploratory behavioral analysis. Acad. Manage. J. 19,4 (Dec. 1976). 577-590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35 Spence. J.O. A case study analysis of organizational communication effectiveness between user-managers and information service department personnel. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lobbock, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. 36 Stumpf, S., and Hartman, K. Individual exploration to organzational committment or withdrawal. Acad. Manage. J. 27, 2 (June 1984), 308-329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. 37 Swanson, E.B. Management information systems: Appreciation and involvement. Manage. Sci. 21. (1974), 178-188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 38 Zand, D., and Sorenson, R. Theory of change and the effective use of management science. Admin. Sci. Q. 20, (Dec. 1975). 532-545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction

                Recommendations

                Reviews

                John M. Hammer

                User involvement during system design could conceivably cause improved user satisfaction, system utilization, or both. In addition, satisfaction could cause improved utilization, or vice versa. The causal connection between these three is examined via a survey. It was found that involvement caused increased satisfaction and utilization, and in addition that satisfaction caused increased usage.

                Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

                Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image Communications of the ACM
                  Communications of the ACM  Volume 29, Issue 3
                  The MIT Press scientific computation series
                  March 1986
                  71 pages
                  ISSN:0001-0782
                  EISSN:1557-7317
                  DOI:10.1145/5666
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 1986 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 1 March 1986

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • article

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader