skip to main content
10.1145/57216.57226acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Causes of motivational problems among AI managers

Published:01 May 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

A survey of members of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence revealed that AI managers perceived their jobs less motivational than do their subordinates. A second survey was undertaken to ascertain the causes. Seven principal causes were postulated and a structured interview was conducted with 22 AI managers, the majority of whom were first-line managers. The results showed that almost three-quarters would rather be doing AI work than managing it. Two-thirds were dissatisfied with the current technology in AI. In addition, in most cases the applications chosen for initial demonstration of the validity of AI were not challenging. In some companies there are jurisdictional problems concerning which organizations should have principal responsibility for developing AI applications. Also revealed in the survey was a threshold of new problems which will make motivation even more difficult. Although the survey sample is small, it provided enough information to be able to suggest approaches for improving motivation.

References

  1. 1.Couger, 3. D. and Scott C. Mclntyre. "Motivation Norms for Artificial Intelligence Personnel," Proceedings, Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, :january~ /987~ pp. 370-37#.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Couger~ :j. D. and Scott C. Mclntyre. "Motivational Norms for Knowledge Engineers Compared to Those of Software Engineers," Journal of Management information Systems, Winter, 1987-1988~ pp. 82-93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Couger~ 3. D. and Scott C. Mcintyre. "Problems Among Managers of AI Personnel~" Proceedings. Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, :January, 1988, pp. 157-16I. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Couger, 3. D. and R. A. Zawacki. Motivatin~ and Mana~in~ Computer Personnel, Wiley, New York, i gs0. - Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Hackman, 3. R.~ G. R. Oldham, R. 3ensen~ and K. Purcly. "A New Strategy for Sob Enrichment," California Management Review, 1975, 17, pp. 57-71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.Ford, R. N. Motivation Through the Work Itself, American Management Association~ New York~ 1959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Turner, A. N. and P. R. Lawrence. Industrial 3obs and the Worker, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Davis~ L. E. "Sob Design; Overview and Future Directions," 3ournal of Contempgrarv Business, 6, 2, 1978, pp. gS-102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Causes of motivational problems among AI managers

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGCPR '88: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR conference on Management of information systems personnel
              May 1988
              216 pages
              ISBN:0897912624
              DOI:10.1145/57216
              • Chairman:
              • E. M. Awad

              Copyright © 1988 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 May 1988

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader