skip to main content
10.1145/638249.638273acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

HaWCoS: the "hands-free" wheelchair control system

Published:08 July 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

A system allowing to control an electrically powered wheelchair without using the hands is introduced. HaWCoS -- the "Hands-free" Wheelchair Control System -- relies upon muscle contractions as input signals. The working principle is as follows. The constant stream of EMG signals associated with any arbitrary muscle of the wheelchair driver is monitored and reduced to a stream of contraction events. The reduced stream affects an internal program state which is translated into appropriate commands understood by the wheelchair electronics. The feasibility of the proposed approach is illustrated by a prototypical implementation for a state-of-the-art wheelchair. Operating a HaWCoS-wheelchair requires extremely little effort, which makes the system suitable even for people suffering from very severe physical disabilities.

References

  1. C. W. Anderson, S. V. Devulapalli, and E. A. Stolz. EEG as a means of communication: preliminary experiments in EEG analysis using neural networks. In ASSETS '94 -- Proceedings of the First Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pages 141--147, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Birbaumer, N. Ghanayim, T. Hinterberger, I. Iversen, B. Kotchoubey, A. Kübler, J. Perelmouter, E. Taub, and H. Flor. A spelling device for the paralyzed. Nature, 398:297--298, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Z. Bozorgzadeh, G. E. Birch, and S. G. Mason. The LFASD brain computer interface: On-line identification of imagined finger flexions in the spontaneous EEG of able-bodied subjects. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 4, pages 2385--2388, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. D. Crisman, M. E. Cleary, and J. C. Rojas. The deictically controlled wheelchair. Image and Vision Computing, 16:235--249, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E.-A. Degermann, R. Dahlberg, D. Wallen, E. Björklund, and D. Lundman. Ergonomic and technical evaluation of an eye-controlled computer with 'eyegaze'. Work, 5:213--221, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. T. Felzer and B. Freisleben. An input device for human-computer interaction based on muscle control, submitted for publication, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Felzer and B. Freisleben. BRAINLINK: A software tool supporting the development of an EEG-based brain-computer interface, submitted for publication, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. O. Fukuda, T. Tsuji, and M. Kaneko. Pattern classification of EEG signals using a log-linearized Gaussian mixture neural network. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, volume 5, pages 2479--2484, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. R. Kennedy, R. A. E. Bakay, M. M. Moore, K. Adams, and J. Goldwaithe. Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. IEEE Transactions On Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(2): 198--202, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Kübler, B. Kotchoubey, T. Hinterberger, N. Ghanayim, J. Perelmouter, M. Schauer, C. Fritsch, E. Taub, and N. Birbaumer. The thought translation device: a neurophysiological approach to communication in total motor paralysis. Exp. Brain Res., 124:223--232, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. P. Martín, M. Mazo, I. Fernández, J. L. Lázaro, F. J. Rodríguez, and A. Gardel. Multifunctional and autonomous, high performance architecture: application to a wheelchair for disabled people that integrates different control and guidance strategies. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 23:1--6, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Mazo, F. J. Rodríguez, J. L. Lázaro, J. Ureña, J. C. García, E. Santiso, P. Revenga, and J. J. García. Electronic control for a wheel-chair guided by oral commands and ultrasonic and infrared sensors. IFAC Artificial Intelligence in Real Time Control, pages 249--254, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Mazo, F. J. Rodríguez, J. L. Lázaro, J. Ureña, J. C. García, E. Santiso, and P. A. Revenga. Electronic control of a wheelchair guided by voice commands. Control Eng. Practice, 3(5):665--674, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K. S. Park and K. T. Lee. Eye-controlled human/computer interface using the line-of-sight and the intentional blink. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 30(3):463--473, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Perelmouter and N. Birbaumer. A binary spelling interface with random errors. IEEE Transactions On Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(2):227--232, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Polak and A. Kostov. Training setup for control of neural prosthesis using brain-computer interface. In Proceedings of The First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference: Serving Humanity, Advancing Technology, page 446, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Th. Röfer and A. Lankenau. Architecture and applications of the Bremen autonomous wheelchair. Information Sciences, 126:1--20, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, editors, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructures of Cognition, volume 1, pages 318--362, Cambridge, MA, 1986. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. J. Tecce, J. Gips, C. P. Olivieri, L. J. Pok, and M. R. Consiglio. Eye movement control of computer functions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29:319--325, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. R. Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, W. J. Heetderks, D. J. McFarland, P. H. Peckham, G. Schalk, E. Donchin, L. A. Quatrano, C. J. Robinson, and T. M. Vaughan. Brain-computer interface technology: A review of the first international meeting. IEEE Transactions On Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(2): 164--173, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. R. Wolpaw, D. J. McFarland, and T. M. Vaughan. Brain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center. IEEE Transactions On Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(2):222--226, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. W. Zhang, V. G. Duffy, R. Linn, and A. Luximon. Voice recognition based human-computer interface design. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 37:305--308, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. HaWCoS: the "hands-free" wheelchair control system

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              Assets '02: Proceedings of the fifth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies
              July 2002
              238 pages
              ISBN:1581134649
              DOI:10.1145/638249

              Copyright © 2002 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 8 July 2002

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              Assets '02 Paper Acceptance Rate31of76submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader