skip to main content
10.1145/779928.779940acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On the core of the multicommodity flow game

Published:09 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

In citepapa, Papadimitriou formalized the notion of routing stability in BGP as the following coalitional game theoretic problem: Given a network with a multicommodity flow satisfying node capacity and demand constraints, the payoff of a node is the total flow originated or terminated at it. A payoff allocation is in the core if and only if there is no subset of nodes that can increase their payoff by seceding from the network. We answer one of the open problems in citepapa by proving that for any network, the core is non-empty in both the transferable (where the nodes can compensate each other with side payments) and the non-transferable case. In the transferable case we show that such an allocation can be computed in polynomial time. We also generalize this result to the case where a strictly concave utility function is associated with each commodity.

References

  1. O. Bondareva. The core of an n person game. Vestnik Leningrad University, 13:141--142, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. W. C. Brainard and H. E. Scarf. How to compute equilibrium prices in 1891. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, 1270, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Chardaire. Facility Location Optimization and Cooperative Games. PhD Thesis, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. V. Conitzer and T. Sandholm. Complexity of determining non-emptiness of the core. Technical Report CS-02-137, CMU, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. X. Deng, T. Ibaraki, and H. Nagamochi. Algorithms and complexity in combinatorial optimization games. In Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 720--729, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. X. Deng and C. Papadimitriou. On the complexity of cooperative game solution concepts. Mathematics of Operations Research, 19(2):257--266, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. Devanur, A. Saberi, C. Papadimitriou, and V. V. Vazirani. Market equilibrium via a primal-dual-type algorithm. In Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pages 389--395, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. U. Faigle, S. Fekete, W. Hochst$ddotmboxa$ttler, and W. Kern. On the complexity of testing membership in the core of min-cost spanning tree games. International Journal of Game Theory, 26:361--366, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Feigenbaum, C. Papadimitriou, R. Sami, and S. Shenker. A bgp-based mechanism for lowest-cost routing. In Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 173--182, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Feigenbaum and S. Shenker. Distributed algorithmic mechanism design: Recent results and future directions. In International Workshop on Discrete Algorithms and Methods for Mobile Computing and Communications, pages 1--13. ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. Garg and N. Young. On-line end-to-end congestion control. In Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pages 303--312, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Goemans and M. Skutella. Cooperative facility location games. In Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 76--85, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Granot. A generalized linear production model: A unified model. Mathematical Programming, 34:212--222, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Jain and V. V. Vazirani. Application of approximation algorithms to cooperative games. In Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 364--372, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. Kalai and E. Zemel. Generalized network problems yielding totally balanced games. Operations Research, 30:998--1008, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. F. P. Kelly. Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 8:33--37, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. F. P. Kelly, A. Maulloo, and D. Tan. Rate control in communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49:237--252, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. F. P. Kelly and V. V. Vazirani. Rate control as a market equilibrium. In preparation, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Low and D. Lapsley. Optimization, flow control 1: Basic algorithm and convergence. IEEE Transactions on Networking, 7(6):861--874, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Low, F. Paganini, and J. Doyle. Internet congestion control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 22(1):28--43, Feb. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. N. Nisan and A. Ronen. Algorithmic mechanism design. In Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 129--140, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. G. Owen. On the core of linear production games. Mathematical Programming, 9:358--370, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. C. H. Papadimitriou. Algorithms, games, and the internet. In Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 749--753, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Scarf. The core of an n person game. Econometrica, 35(1):50--69, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. L. Shapley. On balanced sets and cores. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 14:453--460, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. L. Shapley and M. Shubik. The assignment game 1: The core. International Journal of Game Theory, 1:111--130, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. Shenker. Fundamental design issues for the future internet. IEEE Journal Selected Areas Communication, 13:1176--1188, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. V. Vazirani. Approximation Algorithms. Springer-Verlag, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the core of the multicommodity flow game

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '03: Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
      June 2003
      292 pages
      ISBN:158113679X
      DOI:10.1145/779928

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 June 2003

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader