ABSTRACT
This paper addresses the direct manipulation of concept maps. These maps are visually supported by graph-based diagrams. Constraints on nodes, visual attributes and arcs, reflect the syntax and semantic of the underlying conceptual model. Tools allowing the manipulation of concept maps convey these constraints by offering simple feedback hints to user actions. Particular application domains require the use of spatial regions (contexts) to convey equivalence on concept properties or types. In these cases, further restrictions are imposed. Therefore, richer feedback must be supported for effective direct manipulation.The paper proposes an approach to handle spatial contexts in concept maps. The approach provides means to define enhanced feedback on direct manipulation of concepts and relations within and over context boundaries. The technique is based on the separtion of the feedback representations for device and action. It controls their relative distance, mobility and visual attributes. Manipulation of contexts and simultaneous views over contexts are also discussed. Specific behaviors are proposed and a technique to offer coherent views on multiple contexts is presented. The architecture of the system that supports these features is described.
- P. Antunes and N. Guimarães. Structuring elements for group interaction. In Second Conference on Concurrent Engineering, Research and Applications (CE95), Washington, DC, August 1995. Concurrent Technologies Corporation.Google Scholar
- Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute. Hardy homepage, 1997. http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/~hardy.Google Scholar
- R. Axelrod. Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1976.Google Scholar
- C. Batini, S. Ceri, and S. Navathe. Concepual Database Design: An ER Approach. Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Battista, P. Eades, R. Tamassia, and I. Tollis. Algorithms for drawing graphs: an annotated bibliography. Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, Brown University, June 1994. ftp://wilma.cs.brown.edu/pub/-papers/compgeo/gdbiblio.ps.z.Google Scholar
- G. Booch. Object Oriented Design with Applications. Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Booch and J. Rumbaught. Unified Method for Object-Oriented Development Set. Rational Software Corporation, 1995.Google Scholar
- L. Carrico, P. Antunes, and N. Guimarães. Managing perspectives of changing organizational systems. Working document available upon request http://digitais.ist.utl.pt/lmc, 1997.Google Scholar
- L. Carriço and N. Guimarães. Facilitating analysis and diagnosis in organisations. In Proceedings of the CAiSE '97 Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Carriço and N. Guimarães. Integrated multiviews. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, Special Issue on visual Navigation: Methods and Tools, 1998. Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
- P. Coad and E. Yourdon. Object Oriented Analysis. Prentice-Hall, 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Eden. Strategy development and implementation: Cognitive mapping for group support. In J. Hendry and G. Johnson with J. Newton, editors, Strategic Thinking: Leadership and the Management of Change. Addison-Wesley, 1993.Google Scholar
- C. Ellis and J. Wainer. Goal-based models of collaboration. Collaborative Computing, 1:61--86, 1994.Google Scholar
- B. Gaines and M. Shaw. Concept maps as hypermedia components. Knowledge Science Institute Home Page, 1995. http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Huff. Mapping strategic thought. In A. Huff, editor, Mapping Strategic Thought. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 1990.Google Scholar
- V. Kremer, Rob. Concept Graphs: A Concept Map "MetaLanguage". PhD thesis, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Laukkanen. Comparative Cause Mapping of Management Cognitions. Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, 1992.Google Scholar
- R. Marshak. Workflow white paper: An overview of workflow software. In WORKFLOW '94 Conference Proceedings, San Jose, August 1994.Google Scholar
- R. Medina-Mora, T. Winograd, R. Flores, and F. Flores. The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW '92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pages 281--288, Toronto, Canada, November 1992. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Mintzberg. Structure in Fives. Prentice-Hall, 1983.Google Scholar
- B. Myers, A. Ferrency, R. McDaniel, R. Miller, Patrick D., Andy M., and A. Klimovitski. The amulet v2.0 reference manual. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996.Google Scholar
- F. Penz and L. Carrico. Objects feeling objects in a multiview object space. In Vienna Conference on HUMAN CONPUTER INTERACTION 93, Fin de Siècle, Viena, Austria, September 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Poras. Stream Analysis. Organization Development. Addison- Wesley, 1987.Google Scholar
- R. Reger. Managerial thought structures and competitive positioning. In A. Huff, editor, Mapping Strategic Thought. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 1990.Google Scholar
- L. Shastri. Semantic Networks: An Evidential Formalization and its Connectionist Realization. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Shum and N. Hammond. Argumentation-based design rationale: From conceptual roots to current use. Technical Report EPC-1993-106, Rank Xerox Research Centre, 1993.Google Scholar
- J. Sowa, editor. Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge. Morgan-Kaufman, San Mateo, California, 1991.Google Scholar
- Visio. Visio homepage, 1997. http://www.visio.com.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Ontology merging in the context of concept maps
Abstract - This paper proposes the approach to a concept map merging using methods and tools developed for the same task in the domain of ontologies. The developed method is based on ideas that concept maps and ontologies have structural similarities, ...
Understanding, Manipulating and Searching Hand-Drawn Concept Maps
Concept maps are an important tool to organize, represent, and share knowledge. Building a concept map involves creating text-based concepts and specifying their relationships with line-based links. Current concept map tools usually impose specific task ...
Topological Scoring of Concept Maps for Cybersecurity Education
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationConcept maps are a well-known pedagogical tool for organizing and representing knowledge and developing a deep understanding of concepts. Unfortunately, the grading of concept maps tends to be manual and tedious thereby, posing serious limitation for an ...
Comments