The evolution of artifacts in cooperative work: constructing meaning through activity

ABSTRACT

A two year case study of cooperative work was inspired by the installation of CSCW software in a community bank. The framework for the research was developed by combining activity theory and the principles of communities of practice. This framework provided a useful model and insight into the evolution of artifact meaning, sharing, and credibility. In essence, users needed to experience results within the activity system and social structure of the community to establish meaning and credibility. The study applied the theory and language of activity theory and communities of practice to make sense of case phenomena and provide a richer context for understanding traditional principles.

References

1. Ackerman, M. S. and C. Halverson. Considering an organization's memory. Proceedings of CSCW 98, Seattle, Washington, November, 1998, 39--48.
2. Ackerman, M. S. and B. Starr. Social activity indicators: Interface components for CSCW systems. Proceedings of UIST 95, Pittsburg, PA, November, 1995, 159--168.
3. Angrosino, M. V. and K. A. Mays de Perez. Rethinking observation: From method to context. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, Editors. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2000, 673--697.
4. Bannon, L. and S. Boedker. Beyond the interface: Encountering artifacts in use. In Designing Interactions: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface, J. Carroll, Editor. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991, Chapter 12.
5. Bardram, J. Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities. Proceedings of CSCW 98, Seattle, Washington, November, 1998, 89--98.
6. Barley, S. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1990, 61--103.
7. Bertelsen, O. and C. Nielsen. Dynamics in wastewater treatment: A framework for understanding formal constructs in complex technical settings. Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW'99), Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 277--290.
8. Bertelsen, O. W. Organizational learning is crystallised into artifacts. SIGOIS Bulletin, 17(3), 1996, 37--39.
9. Bradley, J. Human-computer interaction and the growing role of context. American Society for Information Science Bulletin, 24(3), 1998, 18--19.
10. Burkhardt, M. and D. Brass. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1990, 104--127.
11. Carasik, R. and C. Grantham. A case study of CSCW in a dispersed organization. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '88), Washington, D.C., May, 1988, 61--66.
12. Collins, P., S. Shukla, and D. Redmiles. Activity theory and system design: A view from the trenches. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(1-2), 2002, 55--80.
13. Ebbs, C. A. Qualitative research inquiry: Issues of power and ethics. Education, 117(2), 1996, 217--222.
14. Ehrlich, S. F. Strategies for encouraging successful adoption of office communication systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 5(4), 1987, 340--357.
15. Engestrom, Y. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 2000, 960--974.
16. Erickson, T. and W. A. Kellogg, Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 2000, 59--83.
17. Flores, F., Graves, M., Hartfield, B., & Winograd, T. Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(2), 1988, 153--172.
18. Gerson, E., & Star, L. Analysing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4(3), 1986, 257--270.
19. Heron, J. and P. Reason. The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research 'with' rather than 'on' people. In Handbook of Action Research, P. Reason and H. Bradbury, Eds. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001, 179--188.
20. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995.
21. Jettmar, E. M. and M. W. Rapp. Computer mediated communication: A relational perspective. Paper presented at Annual Convention of the Western States Communication Association, Pasadena, CA, 1996.
22. Kaptelinin, V., B. Nardi, and C. Macaulay. The activity checklist: A tool for representing the "space" of context. Interactions, July & August, 1999, 27--39.
23. Karsten, H. and M. Jones. The long and winding road: Collaborative IT and organisational change. Proceedings of CSCW 98, Seattle, Washington, November, 1998, 29--38.
24. Kuutti, K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Context and Consciousness, B. Nardi, Editor. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997, 17--44.
25. Kuutti, K. and T. Arvonen. Identifying potential CSCW applications by means of activity theory concepts: A case example. Proceedings of CSCW'92, Toronto, Canada, November, 1992, 233--240.
26. Kuutti, K. and H. Karasti. Supporting shared interpretations of a space of representations: A case of radiological conferences. Available: http://webtools.cityu.edu.hk/ct1995/kuutti.htm, 2000.
27. Leontev, A. N. Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1978.
28. Luff, P. and C. Heath. The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(4), 2000, 669--699.
29. Mambrey, P. and M. Robinson. Understanding the role of documents in a hierarchical flow of work. Proceedings of Group 97, Phoenix, Arizona, November, 1997, 119--127.
30. Markus, M. L. Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communications on social life at work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 1994, 119--149.
31. Nardi, B. Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In Context and Consciousness, B. Nardi, Editor. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997, 7--16.
32. Orlikowski, W. Evolving with notes: organizational change around groupware technology. Available: http://ccs.mit.edu/papers/CCSWP186.html, 2000.
33. Sachs, P. Transforming work: Collaboration, learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 1995, 36--44.
34. Savenye, W. C. and R. S. Robinson. Qualitative research issues and methods: An introduction for educational technologists. In Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, D. H. Jonassen, Editor. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York, 1996, 1171--1195.
35. Shukla, S. Context and consciousness activity theory and human-computer interaction: Two book reviews. SIGCHI Bulletin, 29(2), 1997, 51--55.
36. Suchman, L. Office procedure as practical action: Models of work and system design. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1(4), 1983, 320--328.
37. Tyre, M. and W. Orlikowski. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 5(1), 1994, 98--119.
38. Vandenbosch, B. and M. J. Ginzberg. Lotus notes and collaboration: Plus ca change.. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(3), 1996/1997, 65--81.
39. Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Law, social and behavioral sciences

    • Psychology

    • Sociology

• Human-centered computing

  • Collaborative and social computing

    • Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms

      • Computer supported cooperative work

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing and business

      • Computer supported cooperative work

    • Management of computing and information systems

      • Implementation management

        • Pricing and resource allocation

      • Information system economics