skip to main content
10.1145/985692.985707acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

"Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres

Published:25 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most current designs of information technology are based on the notion of supporting distinct tasks such as document production, email usage, and voice communication. In this paper we present empirical results that suggest that people organize their work in terms of much larger and thematically connected units of work. We present results of fieldwork observation of information workers in three different roles: analysts, software developers, and managers. We discovered that all of these types of workers experience a high level of discontinuity in the execution of their activities. People average about three minutes on a task and somewhat more than two minutes using any electronic tool or paper document before switching tasks. We introduce the concept of working spheres to explain the inherent way in which individuals conceptualize and organize their basic units of work. People worked in an average of ten different working spheres. Working spheres are also fragmented; people spend about 12 minutes in a working sphere before they switch to another. We argue that design of information technology needs to support people's continual switching between working spheres.

References

  1. Bannon, L., Cypher, A., Greenspan, S., and Monty, M., Evaluation and analysis of users' activity organization. Proceedings of CHI 1983, ACM Press (1983), 54--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Belloti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., and Smith, I., Taking email to task: The design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool. Proceedings of CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 345--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Gillie, T. and Broadbent D., What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity. Psychological Research, 50, (1989), 243--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Horne, J.H. and Lupton, T., The work activities of 'middle' managers - An exploratory study. The Journal of Management Studies, 2, (1965), 14--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hudson, J.M., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W.A. and Erickson, T. "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do:" Availability and interruption in research management. Proceedings of CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mintzberg, H., Structured observation as a method to study managerial work. The Journal of Management Studies, 7, (1970), 87--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mintzberg, H., The Nature of Managerial Work. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs N.J. USA, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Miyata, Y. and Norman, D.A., Psychological issues in support of multiple activities, in User Centered System Design, D.A. Norman and S.W. Draper (Eds). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., USA (1986), 265--284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. O'Conaill, B. and Frohlich, D. Timespace in the workplace: Dealing with interruptions. Proceedings of CHI 95, ACM Press (1995), 262--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Panko, R., Managerial communication patterns. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2,1, (1992), 95--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Perlow, L.A., The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, (1999), 57--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sproull, L.S., The nature of managerial attention. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, 1, (1984), 9--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Strauss, A. and Corbin J., Basics of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. USA, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2004
      742 pages
      ISBN:1581137028
      DOI:10.1145/985692

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader