skip to main content
10.1145/3563657.3596128acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recapturing Product as Material Supply: Hoverboards as Garbatrage

Published:10 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The volatility of modern economics, and marketing paired with highly extended and globalized supply chains produces goods with explicit market inefficiencies. This pictorial explores a design process, “Garbatrage,” wherein designers exploit the difference in value between parts in waste product and those used in new products. Drawing upon our own material re-use of hoverboards, we inductively outline a framework to help designers consider the micro- and macro-economic context of material recapture of waste components, necessary to make for more circular economies and sustainable supply chains at scale. We then apply this framework to identify other potential targets for Garbatrage. We conclude with opportunities for design to make the practice of Garbatrage more widely adoptable.

References

  1. Alexander T Adams, Ilan Mandel, Anna Shats, Alina Robin, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2020. PuffPacket: A Platform for Unobtrusively Tracking the Fine-Grained Consumption Patterns of E-cigarette Users. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Nirupam Aich, Katarzyna Kordas, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Tara Sabo-Attwood. 2020. The Hidden Risks of E-Waste: Perspectives from Environmental Engineering, Epidemiology, Environmental Health, and Human-Computer Interaction. In Transforming Global Health. Springer, 161–178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Riga Anggarendra and Margot Brereton. 2016. Engaging Children with Nature through Environmental HCI. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. 310–315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Apple, Inc. 2018. Apple adds Earth Day Donations to Trade-in and Recycling Program. Apple News Room (Apr 2018). https://www.apple.com/ newsroom/2018/04/apple-adds-earth-day-donations-to-trade-in-and-recycling-program/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Apple, Inc. 2023. Apple Introduces the new HomePod with Breakthrough Sound and Intelligence. Apple News Room (Jan 2023). https://www.apple. com/newsroom/2023/01/apple-introduces-the-new-homepod-with-breakthrough-sound-and-intelligence/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Vicente Arroyos, Maria LK Viitaniemi, Nicholas Keehn, Vaidehi Oruganti, Winston Saunders, Karin Strauss, Vikram Iyer, and Bichlien H Nguyen. 2022. A Tale of Two Mice: Sustainable Electronics Design and Prototyping. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lilit Avetisyan, Chengxin Zhang, Sue Bai, Ehsan Moradi Pari, Fred Feng, Shan Bao, and Feng Zhou. 2022. Design a Sustainable Micro-mobility Future: Trends and Challenges in the US and EU. Journal of Engineering Design 33, 8-9 (2022), 587–606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ryan Bassil. 2015. The Rise and Fall of the Hoverboard: The Unlikely Music Trend of the Year. https://www.vice.com/en/article/rkqxke/the-riseand-fall-of-the-hoverboard-the-unlikely-music-trend-of-the-yearGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jean Baudrillard. 2016. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Joseph Bernstein. 2015. Inside China's Memefacturing Factories, Where The Hottest New Gadgets Are Made. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/josephbernstein/how-to-make-millions-of-hoverboards-almost-overnightGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Blakadder. 2021. Tasmota Supported Devices Repository. https://templates.blakadder.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eli Blevis. 2007. Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention & Disposal, Renewal & Reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 503–512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Andy Boucher. 2023. Research Products at Scale: Learnings from Designing Devices in Multiples of Ones, Tens, Hundreds and Thousands. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 177, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581540Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hronn Brynjarsdottir, Maria Håkansson, James Pierce, Eric Baumer, Carl DiSalvo, and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Sustainably Unpersuaded: How Persuasion Narrows our Vision of Sustainability. In Proceedings of The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 947–956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Joey Castillo. 2022. . https://www.joeycastillo. com/objects/sensorwatch/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Scott Cendrowski. 2019. How the Hoverboard Fad Blew Up. https://fortune.com/longform/hoverboard-industry/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Andrew Chubb. 2015. China's Shanzhai Culture:‘Grabism‘and the Politics of Hybridity. In The Journal of Contemporary China 24, 92 (2015), 260–279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Roberto Cibin, Sarah Robinson, Nicola J. Bidwell, Conor Linehan, Laura Maye, Nadia Pantidi, and Maurizio Teli. 2021. Land, Water and Sun: Tuning into Socio-Ecological Relations in Radio Design. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 1954–1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Enrico Costanza, Sarvapali D Ramchurn, and Nicholas R Jennings. 2012. Understanding Domestic Energy Consumption through Interactive Visualisation: a field study. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 216–225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Maitrayee Deka and Adam Arvidsson. 2022. Names doing rounds: On Brands in the Bazaar Economy. Journal of Consumer Culture 22, 2 (2022), 495–514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ben Depoorter. 2008. Technology and Uncertainty: the Shaping Effect on Copyright Law. U. Pa. L. Rev. 157 (2008), 1831.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kristin N Dew and Daniela K Rosner. 2019. Designing with Waste: a Situated Inquiry into the Material Excess of Making. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1307–1319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ni Kadek Yuni Diantari. 2021. Trend Cycle Analysis on Fast Fashion Products. Journal of Aesthetics, Design, and Art Management 1, 1 (2021), 24–33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the Landscape of Sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1975–1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and Environmental Sustainability: the Politics of Design and the Design of Politics. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Cédric Durand. 2017. Fictitious Capital: How Finance is Appropriating Our Future. Verso Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jan Fell, Pei-Yi Kuo, Travis Greene, and Jyun-Cheng Wang. 2022. A Biocentric Perspective on HCI Design Research Involving Plants. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 5, Article 46 (oct 2022), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Vanessa Forti, Cornelis Peter Baldé, Ruediger Kuehr, and Garam Bel. 2020. The Global E-Waste Monitor 2020. United Nations University (UNU), International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA), Bonn/ Geneva/Rotterdam 120 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jennifer Gabrys. 2012. Salvage. In Depletion Design: A Glossary of Network Ecologies. Vol. 8. Institute of Network Cultures.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Guiseppe Getto and Jack T Labriola. 2016. IFixit Myself: User-Generated Content Strategy in ‘the free repair guide for everything‘. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 59, 1 (2016), 37–55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Mike Hazas, AJ Bernheim Brush, and James Scott. 2012. Sustainability Does not Begin with the Individual. Interactions 19, 5 (2012), 14–17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lara Houston, Steven J Jackson, Daniela K Rosner, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. Values in Repair. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1403–1414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Andrew Huang 2003. Hacking the Xbox: An Introduction to Reverse Engineering. No Starch Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tanyoung Kim, Hwajung Hong, and Brian Magerko. 2010. Design Requirements for Ambient Display that Supports Sustainable Lifestyle. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 103–112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Bran Knowles, Lynne Blair, Stuart Walker, Paul Coulton, Lisa Thomas, and Louise Mullagh. 2014. Patterns of Persuasion for Sustainability. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 1035–1044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Donald F Kuratko, Harrison L Holt, and Emily Neubert. 2020. Blitzscaling: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Business Horizons 63, 1 (2020), 109–119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Eldy S Lazaro Vasquez, Hao-Chuan Wang, and Katia Vega. 2020. Introducing the Sustainable Prototyping Life Cycle for Digital Fabrication to Designers. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1301–1312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Thin-Yin Leong and Nang-Laik Ma. 2011. Inkjet Printer Pricing. INFORMS Transactions on Education 11, 3 (2011), 132–135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Silvia Lindtner, Anna Greenspan, and David Li. 2015. Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai Manufacturing and Maker Entrepreneurs. In Proceedings of the Fifth Aecennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives. 85–96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Silvia M Lindtner. 2020. Prototype Nation: China and the Contested Promise of Innovation. Vol. 30. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Kate Mackenzie. 2023. An Introduction | Phenomenal World. https://www.phenomenalworld.org/ analysis/an-introduction/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Paolo Magaudda. 2010. Hacking Practices and their Relevance for Consumer Studies: The Example of the ‘jailbreaking'of the iPhone. Consumers, Commodities and Consumption 12, 1 (2010), 12–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ilan Mandel and Wendy Ju. 2023. Frankenstein's Toolkit: Prototyping Electronics Using Consumer Products. arXiv:2303.13618 [cs.HC]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Jennifer C. Mankoff, Eli Blevis, Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, Susan R. Fussell, Jay Hasbrouck, Allison Woodruff, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. Environmental Sustainability and Interaction. In CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, CA, USA) (CHI EA ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2121–2124. https://doi. org/10.1145/1240866.1240963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Adam Mayer. 2022. Grab the Guts!: Salvaging Electronic Parts from Street Trash. https://www. nycresistor.com/2022/12/28/grab-the-guts-class-is-back-1-11-2023/ NYC Resistor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. James McKenzie. 2020. Bad Business Models. Physics World 33, 1 (2020), 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. EC Merem, YA Twumasi, J Wesley, D Olagbegi, M Crisler, C Romorno, M Alsarari, P Isokpehi, M Afarei, GS Ochai, . 2021. Analyzing the Environmental Risks from Electronic Waste Dumping in the West African Region. Journal of Health Science 11, 1 (2021), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Adam Minter. 2015. Junkyard planet: Travels in the Billion-Dollar Trash Trade. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Condé Nast. 2022. Companies Are Hacking Their Way Around the Chip Shortage. https://www.wired. com/story/chip-shortage-hacks/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Kyuhong Park, Chanhee Kwak, Junyeong Lee, and Jae-Hyeon Ahn. 2018. The Effect of Platform Characteristics on the Adoption of Smart Speakers: Empirical evidence in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics 35, 8 (2018), 2118–2132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Salvatore Pennisi. 2022. Pandemic, Shortages, and Electronic Engineering. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine 22, 3 (2022), 41–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2010. Materializing Energy. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 113–122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Sarah Pink, Kerstin Leder Mackley, Val Mitchell, Marcus Hanratty, Carolina Escobar-Tello, Tracy Bhamra, and Roxana Morosanu. 2013. Applying the Lens of Sensory Ethnography to Sustainable HCI. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 4 (2013), 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Brian Santo. 2022. The Consumer Electronics Hall of Fame: Casio F-91W Wristwatch. https://spectrum. ieee.org/the-consumer-electronics-hall-of-fame-casio-f91w-wristwatchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Daniel Schellong, Philipp Sadek, Carsten Schaetzberger, and Tyler Barrack. 2019. The Promise and Pitfalls of E-scooter Sharing. Europe 12 (2019), 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Zoya Sheftalovich. 2022. The Chips are Down: Putin Scrambles for High-Tech Parts as his Arsenal Goes up in Smoke. https://www.politico.eu/article/the-chips-are-down-russia-hunts-western-parts-to-run-its-war-machines/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Sheri D Sheppard. 1992. Mechanical Dissection: An Experience in How Things Work. Proceedings of the Engineering Education: Curriculum Innovation & Integration (1992), 6–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Jagdeep Singh and Charnita Arora. 2021. Upcycling, Jugaad and Repair Cafes for Prosumption. In State-of-the-Art Upcycling Research and Practice. In Proceedings of the International Upcycling Symposium 2020. Springer, 41–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Katherine W Song, Aditi Maheshwari, Eric M Gallo, Andreea Danielescu, and Eric Paulos. 2022. Towards Decomposable Interactive Systems: Design of a Backyard-Degradable Wireless Heating Interface. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Katherine W Song and Eric Paulos. 2021. Unmaking: Enabling and Celebrating the Creative Material of Failure, Destruction, Decay, and Deformation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Katherine Wei Song and Eric Paulos. 2023. Vim: Customizable, Decomposable Electrical Energy Storage. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Sahra Svensson, Jessika Luth Richter, Eléonore Maitre-Ekern, Taina Pihlajarinne, Aline Maigret, and Carl Dalhammar. 2018. The Emerging ‘Right to Repair’ Legislation in the EU and the US. In Proceedings from Going Green–Care Innovation (2018), 27–29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Ylva Fernaeus, and Mischa Schaub. 2014. Leather as a Material for Crafting Interactive and Physical Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 5–14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Susanna Vogel, Nathalia Campreguer França, Eleni Economidou, Bernhard Maurer, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2020. Circular HCI: Tools for Embedding Circular Thinking in Material-Driven Design. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 233–237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Daniel Votipka, Mary Nicole Punzalan, Seth M Rabin, Yla Tausczik, and Michelle L Mazurek. 2021. An Investigation of Online Reverse Rngineering Community Discussions in the Context of Ghidra. In 2021 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). IEEE, 1–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Dhaval Vyas, Awais Hameed Khan, and Anabelle Cooper. 2023. Democratizing Making: Scaffolding Participation Using e-Waste to Engage Under-Resourced Communities in Technology Design. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 301, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580759Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Ron Wakkary, Audrey Desjardins, Sabrina Hauser, and Leah Maestri. 2013. A Sustainable Design Fiction: Green practices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 4 (2013), 1–34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Laura Watts. 2019. Energy at the End of the World: An Orkney Islands Saga. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Moira Weigel. 2023. Amazon's Trickle-Down Monopoly: Third-Party Sellers and the Transformation of Small Business. Data and Society Research Institute Report, Forthcoming (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Jeanne Whalen. 2022. Sanctions Forcing Russia to use Appliance Parts in Military Gear, U.S. says. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/ 2022/05/11/russia-sanctions-effect-military/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Owen Williams. 2021. Amazon and Google Are Practically Giving Away Smart Speakers. Here's Why. Medium. https://onezero.medium.com/amazon-and-google-are-practically-giving-away-smart-speakers-heres-why-56f0e50bd95cGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Xiling Wu, Caihua Zhang, and Wei Du. 2021. An Analysis on the Crisis of ‘chips shortage‘ in Automobile Industry-Based on the Double Influence of COVID-19 and Trade Friction. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1971. IOP Publishing, 012100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Han Zhang, Goker Aydin, and Rodney P Parker. 2022. Social Responsibility Auditing in Supply Chain Networks. Management Science 68, 2 (2022), 1058–1077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Recapturing Product as Material Supply: Hoverboards as Garbatrage
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 2023
        2717 pages
        ISBN:9781450398930
        DOI:10.1145/3563657

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 July 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        DIS '24
        Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 1 - 5, 2024
        IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader